[pgadmin-hackers] Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reporting status back to pgAdmin

2017-01-11 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ashesh Vashi < ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Dave Page wrote: > >> >> KeyError: u'end_time' >> >> The status file contains: >> >> {"start_time": "2017-01-11 06:27:20.939703 +", "pid": 49363, >> "exi

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module

2017-01-11 Thread George Gelashvili
Hi Dave, Thanks for the pointer. We realized that many of the changes we would need to make for supporting Greenplum would need to go where there is pg version checking throughout the code. This is because unlike PPAS which mostly adds additional features, Greenplum is based on postgres 8.3. It l

[pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache

2017-01-11 Thread Josh Berkus
Pgadmin gurus: I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight? -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My! -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache

2017-01-11 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Pgadmin gurus: > > I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. > However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has > anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight? If memory serves, the reason

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module

2017-01-11 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:24 PM, George Gelashvili wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for the pointer. > We realized that many of the changes we would need to make for supporting > Greenplum would need to go where there is pg version checking throughout the > code. This is because unlike PPAS which

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module

2017-01-11 Thread Robert Eckhardt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:24 PM, George Gelashvili > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Thanks for the pointer. > > We realized that many of the changes we would need to make for supporting > > Greenplum would need to go where there is pg vers

[pgadmin-hackers] Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reporting status back to pgAdmin

2017-01-11 Thread Fahar Abbas
Sure Dave, Will test this after applying the patch today and update the status accordingly. On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ashesh Vashi < > ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:03 PM, D

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Building server without Apache

2017-01-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Jan 12, 2017 4:56 AM, "Dave Page" wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Pgadmin gurus: > > I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. > However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has > anyone run pgAdmin4 against something