Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Dear Devrim,
Finally, I commented out the BuildRequires dependencies for wxGTK2ud in CVS.
It appears that library names needed at build time are not the same under
RedHat, Mandrake and SuSE. So, my 'stupid' recommended way is:
rpmbuild --rebuild
Le Lundi 17 Novembre 2003 19:44, vous avez écrit :
I realize it's a pain, but is it not possible to work the different sets
of BuildRequires into the spec file, using distribution-dependent
conditional statements?
Yes, it is perfectly possible. But, there are so many-many build-time
depencies
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Yes, it is perfectly possible. But, there are so many-many build-time
depencies in wxWindows. Listing them all is quite difficult.
Really? Am I missing something, or would this line suffice (granted,
this is the RH line, but...):
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel,
Dear Adam,
Really? Am I missing something, or would this line suffice (granted,
this is the RH line, but...):
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel, libjpeg-devel, libpng-devel, libtiff-devel
A lot more. A least, expat-devel, pango-devel, zlib-devel, X11-foo-devel,
iconv-devel, etc... See the list
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your explainations. The gtk-devel seems convincing. But there are
other libraries. Feel free to submit a patch and I will integrate it
immediately.
What do you mean by automatic binary dependencies? I thought that RPM
dependencies were enforced by the Requires: line in
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
So are we going to be using the official wxWindows RPMs from now on?
Are we going to run into any problems since we currently use a build of
wxWindows that differs from the official build?
Still absolutely no, there's not a haze of work in committing my
patches,
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
A lot more. A least, expat-devel, pango-devel, zlib-devel, X11-foo-devel,
iconv-devel, etc... See the list below. Under SuSE and Mandrake, many of
these libraries have different naming schemes.
I may be wrong on this one, but I don't think
