Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...

2003-12-03 Thread Dave Page
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Roeckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 02 December 2003 23:10
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...
 
 On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:08:19PM -, Dave Page wrote:
  Hi Guys,
  
  I just finished bundling the source tarball, win32 builds and 
  Slackware build of v1.0.2. This version is built using the new wx 
  snapshot, which has also been added to the ftp mirrors.
 
 I find the changelog on the website rather strange.  Are all 
 the lines between v1.0.0 and v0.9.3devel what changed 
 between 1.0.0 and 1.0.2?  The dates seems to match.

The header is the version to which changes were applied. E.g.

V1.0.0

- Fixed fnubar widget

Means that we fixed the buggy fnubar widget that was in the 1.0.0
release.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Website RTL support

2003-12-03 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Le Mardi 02 Décembre 2003 18:40, Ossama Khayat a écrit :
 I tried that before, and now again. It gives:
 Connection refused.
 Still, if i use: psql test
 it logs me in.

Dear Ossama,

Can you send me your /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf and /var/lib/pgsql/data/
postgresql.conf. Then, we can discuss using instant messaging...

Cheers,
Jean-Michel


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 1.0.2 Bundled...

2003-12-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote:



Agreed, it is a little confusing. Suggestions for improvements anyone?

Regards, Dave.
 

CHANGELOG.txt could look like this, without release headers:

   li2003-12-03 AP  ***  fix connect to MULE_INTERNAL db
   li2003-12-02 AP   fix acl property display
   li2003-12-02 AP   another fix closing Query Tool
   li2003-12-01 AP   add display of superuser context settings
   li2003-11-30 AP   handle covering index for Foreign Keys
   li2003-11-30 AP   fix closing Query Tool while query is running
   li2003-11-30 AP   fix error message when SET client_encoding fails
   li2003-11-26 AP 1.0.2 fix notice processing for pgQueryThread
   li2003-11-24 AP   refactoring stats/depends: populate on demand
--^ denotes the release version, 
   or *** if this patch is going to trunk also.

Maybe we need release notes too, extracting all lines for released versions.

Regards,
Andreas




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Error message while connecting to a UNICODE

2003-12-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Andreas Pflug wrote:

MULE_INTERNAL-UNICODE not possible, I thought *every* server encoding 
could be read with client_encoding unicode...
Just checked, there's no conversion indeed. What the heck is that at 
all? I didn't find *any* site that's not referencing pgsql when 
searching for MULE_INTERNAL.
Fixed: pgAdmin3 won't try to use Unicode if  server encoding is 
MULE_INTERNAL.
Raphael, since you're using this encoding, what is it good for?

Regards,
Andreas


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Error message while connecting to a UNICODE

2003-12-03 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Andreas Pflug wrote:

Andreas Pflug wrote:

MULE_INTERNAL-UNICODE not possible, I thought *every* server 
encoding could be read with client_encoding unicode...
Just checked, there's no conversion indeed. What the heck is that at 
all? I didn't find *any* site that's not referencing pgsql when 
searching for MULE_INTERNAL.
Fixed: pgAdmin3 won't try to use Unicode if  server encoding is 
MULE_INTERNAL.
Raphael, since you're using this encoding, what is it good for?
In fact I thought I was not. I'm sorry I don't know anything about 
MULE_INTERNAL... (this is a real admittance of total ignorance from 
myself... It looks like it has something to do with what is used in 
emacs [a friend of you as far as I remember]). In fact I configured my 
db to set UNICODE by default and thought it was the one used.
I'll have a look to the config file generated by the postgresql debian 
package debconf forms and try to overlook where this MULE_INTERNAL 
reference comes from...

Hope you were not too disappointed by lack of knowledge...

Regards,
Raphaël


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
 joining column's datatypes do not match


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Error message while connecting to a UNICODE

2003-12-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Raphaël Enrici wrote:

In fact I thought I was not. I'm sorry I don't know anything about 
MULE_INTERNAL... (this is a real admittance of total ignorance from 
myself... It looks like it has something to do with what is used in 
emacs [a friend of you as far as I remember]). In fact I configured my 
db to set UNICODE by default and thought it was the one used.
I'll have a look to the config file generated by the postgresql debian 
package debconf forms and try to overlook where this MULE_INTERNAL 
reference comes from...

Hope you were not too disappointed by lack of knowledge...
Deeply! :-)

Well, if it's an EMACS mode, I should consider switching to MULE_INTERNAL...

Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Error message while connecting to a UNICODE

2003-12-03 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Andreas Pflug wrote:

Raphaël Enrici wrote:

In fact I thought I was not. I'm sorry I don't know anything about 
MULE_INTERNAL... (this is a real admittance of total ignorance from 
myself... It looks like it has something to do with what is used in 
emacs [a friend of you as far as I remember]). In fact I configured 
my db to set UNICODE by default and thought it was the one used.
I'll have a look to the config file generated by the postgresql 
debian package debconf forms and try to overlook where this 
MULE_INTERNAL reference comes from...
Hope you were not too disappointed by lack of knowledge...
Deeply! :-) 
Shame on me! :)

Well, if it's an EMACS mode, I should consider switching to 
MULE_INTERNAL...
That's what I was suggesting :) I can't understand you didn't see it! ;p

I just had a quick look to template1 and it is effectively in 
MULE_INTERNAL. I think this is the rest of some testing I did about 3 or 
4 weeks ago... I didn't clear my environment after that. That's why 
template1 is in EMULE_INTERNAL...

Regards,
Raphaël aka MULE_INTERNAL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
 subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
 message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Error message while connecting to a UNICODE

2003-12-03 Thread Andreas Pflug
Raphaël Enrici wrote:

Hope you were not too disappointed by lack of knowledge...


Deeply! :-) 


Shame on me! :)
Well, I'm considering forgiving you. This time...



Regards,
Raphaël aka MULE_INTERNAL
At least mule, not donkey :-)

Regards,
Andreas


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings