Hello all,
What do you people think of adding a so-called
dry run mode to pgAdmin? Basically, what I want
is to be able to step through all the dialogs and forms and
the rest of the UI in some test mode so that I can
see all the GUI elements and their appearance w/o
actually performing any
Log Message:
---
Russian update
Modified Files:
--
pgadmin3/src/ui/ru_RU:
pgadmin3.mo (r1.17 - r1.18)
pgadmin3.po (r1.18 - r1.19)
Index: pgadmin3.po
===
RCS file:
Serguei Mokhov wrote:
Hello Dave and Andreas,
Attached are beta translations of all 1015 messages into ru_RU.
The zip file contains both .po and .mo. Please install.
Done.
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at
Serguei Mokhov wrote:
Hello all,
What do you people think of adding a so-called
dry run mode to pgAdmin? Basically, what I want
is to be able to step through all the dialogs and forms and
the rest of the UI in some test mode so that I can
see all the GUI elements and their appearance w/o
actually
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 19, 2004 1:29 PM
Serguei Mokhov wrote:
Hello all,
What do you people think of adding a so-called
dry run mode to pgAdmin? Basically, what I want
is to be able to step through all the dialogs and forms
Serguei Mokhov wrote:
For myself, the error messages are least of my worries. Most problems I have
are with field labels that cannot fit within a given container when translated,
so a part of a label's text gets truncated. For the dry run mode you need
little context, you just show all possible
Hello all,
I recall Jean-Michel mentioning that .po file which
is more related to wxWindows than pgAdmin... As I see
quite a few translators maintain those too within
the project tree. My question is how necessary is it
to translate this .po file (presumably it should be done
by the wxWindows
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 19, 2004 2:17 PM
Nonetheless, Dave Page built 9X binaries for 1.0.2, which work perfectly okay
for me. Another reason is the registry usage, but as I said, I want to
avoid the use of registry in the dry run
Hello all,
I just upgraded my poEdit installation on W98SE and they now give
the following warning:
Due to Microsoft's draconian licensing terms for The Microsoft Layer for Unicode on
Windows 95/98/ME, poEdit cannot ship with full
Unicode support. You have to manually download unicows.exe from
Serguei Mokhov wrote:
Hello all,
I just upgraded my poEdit installation on W98SE and they now give
the following warning:
Due to Microsoft's draconian licensing terms for The Microsoft Layer for Unicode on
Windows 95/98/ME, poEdit cannot ship with full
Unicode support. You have to manually
10 matches
Mail list logo
