Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Necessity of wxstd.po

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 19, 2004 6:55 PM I recall Jean-Michel mentioning that .po file which is more related to wxWindows than pgAdmin... As I see quite a few translators maintain those too within the project tree. My question

[pgadmin-hackers] Dry Run Mode, + W9X

Hello all, What do you people think of adding a so-called dry run mode to pgAdmin? Basically, what I want is to be able to step through all the dialogs and forms and the rest of the UI in some test mode so that I can see all the GUI elements and their appearance w/o actually performing any

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Dry Run Mode, + W9X

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 19, 2004 1:29 PM Serguei Mokhov wrote: Hello all, What do you people think of adding a so-called dry run mode to pgAdmin? Basically, what I want is to be able to step through all the dialogs and forms

[pgadmin-hackers] Necessity of wxstd.po

Hello all, I recall Jean-Michel mentioning that .po file which is more related to wxWindows than pgAdmin... As I see quite a few translators maintain those too within the project tree. My question is how necessary is it to translate this .po file (presumably it should be done by the wxWindows

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Dry Run Mode, + W9X

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 19, 2004 2:17 PM Nonetheless, Dave Page built 9X binaries for 1.0.2, which work perfectly okay for me. Another reason is the registry usage, but as I said, I want to avoid the use of registry in the dry run

[pgadmin-hackers] Unicode support on W9x

Hello all, I just upgraded my poEdit installation on W98SE and they now give the following warning: Due to Microsoft's draconian licensing terms for The Microsoft Layer for Unicode on Windows 95/98/ME, poEdit cannot ship with full Unicode support. You have to manually download unicows.exe from

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Translation of pgAdmin III V1.2

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 15, 2004 7:24 AM Serguei Mokhov wrote: Hello Andreas, I am maintaing the ru_RU one (and have no plans of stopping doing that). BTW, the translation page shows 1012 for some languages as Total and 1008

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III nearing beta phase

Dave, - Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 12, 2004 9:20 AM Translations We have a huge number of translations for pgAdmin compared to other FOSS projects which is great. Now that we're in feature freeze, it's time to start updating the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III nearing beta phase

- Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 12, 2004 9:36 AM Translations We have a huge number of translations for pgAdmin compared to other FOSS projects which is great. Now that we're in feature freeze, it's time to start

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Translations

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:02:22 + From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Translations Dave Page wrote: I was just looking at the translations status web page and was somewhat surprised to see that virtually all of them are at or very near to 100%. I can't believe this

[pgadmin-hackers] Translation Tables for Current and Website

Jean-Michel, It would be cool to have two more translation status tables at [1]. One for the current dev. version of pgAgmin, and the other one for the website. I just wanted to move on with the website translation, but [1] only has a link to the pgadmin3_website.pot ... thus, to continue

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

- Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 14, 2003 12:29 PM I will look into doing a port then. Thanks :) OK, I got it to compile against wx2.4. Install the normal build, then replace the .exe with the one from

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

- Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 14, 2003 11:07 AM OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Lemme know if anything isn't right. What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? Windows 9x doesn't have the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 14, 2003 11:24 AM OK, tarballs for Slackware, Windows and Source are on Snake. Lemme know if anything isn't right. What's wrong in having a Windows 9x release of pgAdmin? Sorry for jumping in,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Maintenance release

- Original Message - From: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 14, 2003 11:57 AM Serguei Mokhov wrote: Huh? Windows 3.1 is a ancient 16-bit software; Windows 95/98/Me are all 32-bit. They are 32 bit GUIs on a 16 bit OS, formerly called DOS... Yes, I know. Yet

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 translation request into Russian

Hello Jean-Michel, Your proposal sounds like fun. I can also derive fr_CA version of it if needed ;) Thank you for considering me doing pgAdmin3 Russian translation. -s - Original Message - From: Jean-Michel POURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Serguei A. Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 30,