Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote:
Thanks :-) Think I owe you a beer or six!!
Like this one? (I'm on the right :) ) (1.5 liters! :) )
http://www.gunduz.org/lkd/izmirbulusmasi/4.jpg
Snap!
Caught for my "pgAdmin Hall of Fame"
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2004 22:49
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Hey, FC2 rpm is ready!
>
> > Thanks :-) Think I owe you a beer or six!!
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote:
Thanks :-) Think I owe you a beer or six!!
Like this one? (I'm on the right :) ) (1.5 liters! :) )
http://www.gunduz.org/lkd/izmirbulusmasi/4.jpg
:-)
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.orgdevrim.gund
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote:
I can directly upload to ftp.postgresql.org, if you want ;)
I'll bet you can't :-)
Umm, ok ;)
Ok :) I have RH9 at home. I'll do it.
Oh, that wasn't a hint - I was just pointing out that ppl don't all
upgrade imm
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2004 16:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Hey, FC2 rpm is ready!
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote:
OK. Don't forget, you upload to developer.pgadmin.org, but
www.pgadmin.org is a completely different machine which rsyncs the
snapshots from developer every few hours. Ftp is the same - that rsyncs
up to develop
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2004 11:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Hey, FC2 rpm is ready!
>
> Umm, the package is 24 MB, I'm using 512K DSL at work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote:
But... I think if we didn't compile pgadmin3 with --enable-static, then the
package size would be smaller. People would install wxWidgets once; and
then pgadmin3. So I believe we should build wxWidgets rpm
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
But... I think if we didn't compile pgadmin3 with --enable-static, then
the package size would be smaller. People would install wxWidgets once;
and then pgadmin3. So I believe we should build wxWidgets rpm.
You're right, but a wx package we're relying on should be official.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote:
It was funny that I couldn't build it since 5 months :) I
found out my mistake (RTFM!).
Which was?
I followed the instructions of Diego, cleaned up old wx and other stuff.
also unix_compilation.html was my guid
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2004 10:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Hey, FC2 rpm is ready!
>
Hi Devrim,
> Hi,
>
> After very hard work of 5 months, with sleepless nights (
> :-D ) I'm proud to announce the pgadmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
After very hard work of 5 months, with sleepless nights ( :-D ) I'm proud
to announce the pgadmin3 1.2.0-post-beta1 rpm for Fedora Core 2 :-)
It was funny that I couldn't build it since 5 months :) I found out my
mistake (RTFM!).
Anyway... the rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
After very hard work of 5 months, with sleepless nights ( :-D ) I'm proud
to announce the pgadmin3 1.2.0-post-beta1 rpm for Fedora Core 2 :-)
It was funny that I couldn't build it since 5 months :) I found out my
mistake (RTFM!).
Anyway... the
13 matches
Mail list logo
