Thanks, patch applied.
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 May 2005 20:46
> To: Florian G. Pflug
> Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 May 2005 08:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: Re: [SUMMARY] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
>
>
Message d'origine
>Copie à: "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>De: "Adam H.Pendleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sujet: Re: [SUMMARY] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:44:44 -0400
>A: Raphaël Enrici
On May 19, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:To summarize :- we reject the configure.ac.patch which removed ENABLE_STATIC andshould not have been included in trunk yetYou mean reject my entire patch? It did much more than just remove ENABLE_STATIC, so it should not be rejected.- we keep the l
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
To summarize :
- we reject the configure.ac.patch which removed ENABLE_STATIC and
should not have been included in trunk yet
- we keep the latest "acinclude_static.patch" which re-add support for
pg_static_build=yes + takes care of systems where wxWid installations
are both st
To summarize :
- we reject the configure.ac.patch which removed ENABLE_STATIC and
should not have been included in trunk yet
- we keep the latest "acinclude_static.patch" which re-add support for
pg_static_build=yes + takes care of systems where wxWid installations
are both static & dynamic.
Every
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
I'm glad to be so "rare"... It seems I belong to the 1%: I have a
dynamic build. ;)
Please also note that the patch attached reintroduce your code
concerning the static link of
On May 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
What I'm trying to say is this:
I've a dynamic only build. So, wx-config --libs is ok. wx-config
--static --libs gives an error.
According to what I understand from the wx-config --help output is:
if I had both built and would like to get informati
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
> On May 19, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>
>>Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
>>
>>I'm glad to be so "rare"... It seems I belong to the 1%: I have a
>>dynamic build. ;)
>>Please also note that the patch attached reintroduce your code
>>concerning the static link of
On May 19, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
I'm glad to be so "rare"... It seems I belong to the 1%: I have a
dynamic build. ;)
Please also note that the patch attached reintroduce your code
concerning the static link of the rest of the libs (libpq and sons).
However
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
> On May 19, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Can you try the patch attached on OSX with a fresh checkout (don't
>>apply the configure.ac I just sent) ? (I need to rebuild wxWid to
>>generate static libs... it may take a moment).
>>
>
>
> Your attached
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script.
Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
Does this mean the link
On May 19, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script.
Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
Does this mean the linking statically is not possible anymore?
Or has the check just moved to
On May 19, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Can you try the patch attached on OSX with a fresh checkout (don't
apply the configure.ac I just sent) ? (I need to rebuild wxWid to
generate static libs... it may take a moment).
Your attached patch isn't going to do anything. `wx-config --libs
On May 19, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script.
Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
Does this mean the linking statically is not po
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>>Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>>
>>>Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>>>
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script. Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
>>>
>>>
>>>Does this mean the linking statically is not
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script. Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
Does this mean the linking statically is not possible anymore?
Or has the check just moved to another p
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>>I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script. Shouldn't
>>we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
>
>
> Does this mean the linking statically is not possible anymore?
> Or has the check just moved to another place
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script. Shouldn't
we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached).
Does this mean the linking statically is not possible anymore?
Or has the check just moved to another place?
greetings, Florian Pflug
Message d'origine
>Copie à: Dave Page ,
>De: Adam H.Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:14:47 -0400
>A: Raphaël Enrici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Yes. Nice catch.
A small one
Yes. Nice catch.
On May 19, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam H. Pendleton
Sent: 18 May 2005 22:26
To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] New
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>Adam H. Pendleton
>>Sent: 18 May 2005 22:26
>>To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] New acin
On May 19, 2005, at 4:34 AM, Dave Page wrote:It's already mode 755 on a fresh checkout here.Hmmm, it seems that everything gets a mode of 644 when I use the "download tarball" option from the cvsweb interface (still waiting for a Fink binary for Tiger!).ahp
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adam H. Pendleton
> Sent: 18 May 2005 22:26
> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
>
> Attached is a new acinclude.m4,
Attached is a new acinclude.m4, and a patch to our current acinclude,
that relies on wx-config for all the flags. Gone is all the
complicated stuff. The only thing this new acinclude doesn't do is
warn about a missing stc or ogl. It will link against them, but if a
user doesn't have them
25 matches
Mail list logo
