Thanks, updated.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Harshal Dhumal <
harshal.dhu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Text 1.4 is not updated to 1.5 on pgadmin.org
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
> --
> *Harshal Dhumal*
> *Sr. Software Engineer*
>
> EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Hi Dave,
Text 1.4 is not updated to 1.5 on pgadmin.org
[image: Inline image 2]
--
*Harshal Dhumal*
*Sr. Software Engineer*
EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Le 9 oct. 2014 21:14, "Dave Page" a écrit :
>
> Does anyone object if I update the Windows project files to Visual
> Studio 2013 format? That's what is being used for the EDB installer
> builds and my MSI packages of pgAdmin now.
>
Nope. No objection.
Does anyone object if I update the Windows project files to Visual
Studio 2013 format? That's what is being used for the EDB installer
builds and my MSI packages of pgAdmin now.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Ente
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
>>
>> I'd probably be happy with a patch that offered *both* "refresh object
>> on click" and "refresh object and children on click", but not just the
>> latter - the use case is just too narrow imho.
>>
>
> I agree with you.
>
> What do you t
>
>
> I'd probably be happy with a patch that offered *both* "refresh object
> on click" and "refresh object and children on click", but not just the
> latter - the use case is just too narrow imho.
>
>
I agree with you.
What do you think of a ComboBox with the two options?
I'll start to develop,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
>
> Hi, sorry for the delay in responding.
>
> I agree to share with you.
>
> First, the update will be different for "F5 refresh" and per "click
> refresh". This could confuse people.
I don't think so - there's a pretty obvious difference be
Hi, sorry for the delay in responding.
I agree to share with you.
First, the update will be different for "F5 refresh" and per "click
refresh". This could confuse people.
Second, this does not obviate the problem of another user to create, for
example, a table and this table does not appear to
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not
sure how feasible that is though...
>
> Hello,
>
> It could take a look at my patch?
>
> I thought of other ways to implement, but I ended up with this.
Hi,
That
in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not
sure how feasible that is though...
Hello,
It could take a look at my patch?
I thought of other ways to implement, but I ended up with this.
Thanks.
>From d85df2b2543a2974cdd1b8679938cce32991f1b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fr
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
> Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented
>>
>> in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not
>> sure how feasible that is though...
>>
> I thought just in pgObject.
>
> I'll write and tell
Le 05/27/2011 02:08 PM, Vinicius Santos a écrit :
> Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented
>
>> in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not
>> sure how feasible that is though...
>>
>> I thought just in pgObject.
>
> I'll write and tell me wh
Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented
> in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not
> sure how feasible that is though...
>
> I thought just in pgObject.
I'll write and tell me what you think.
Should I send this afternoon (afternoon for me,
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
>>
>> What I'd really like to see is an option which enables on-selection
>> refreshing for all object types.
>>
>
> OK.
>
> I will develop it , and send a patch for you to analyze.
Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be i
>
>
> What I'd really like to see is an option which enables on-selection
> refreshing for all object types.
>
>
OK.
I will develop it , and send a patch for you to analyze.
Thanks.
Hi
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Vinicius Santos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I implemented an option to update functions and trigger functions, by
> clicking on them in the treeview.
>
> This avoids problems when someone changes the function, and I get the old
> version and then overwrite it, without
Hello,
I implemented an option to update functions and trigger functions, by
clicking on them in the treeview.
This avoids problems when someone changes the function, and I get the
old version and then overwrite it, without reminding me from updating
(F5) before.
I did a checkbox in the fo
Hi Steffen,
Le 11/12/2010 17:25, Steffen Kuhn a écrit :
> [...]
> updated german translation.
>
Commited, thanks.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://
Le 09/05/2010 12:05, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I took a look at our website. The screenshots are pretty old. I updated
> all the screenshots I could. You can have a look at them here:
>
> http://wwwdevel.pgadmin.org/screenshots/index.php
>
> I also updated the features page, the TO
Hi,
I took a look at our website. The screenshots are pretty old. I updated
all the screenshots I could. You can have a look at them here:
http://wwwdevel.pgadmin.org/screenshots/index.php
I also updated the features page, the TODO file, the roadmap page and
probably a few other things. This i
Mickael Deloison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for the pgScript help page: better presentation and
> same look as pgAdmin documentation.
Thanks, applied.
And it helped with gzipping the file, no issues applying it this time.
//Magnus
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hacker
Hi,
Here is a patch for the pgScript help page: better presentation and
same look as pgAdmin documentation.
Regards,
Mickael
pgscript.help.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscripti
Many thanks - updates applied to CVS.
It might take a day or so for them to work their way up to the status
pages etc.
Regards, Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Erwien Samantha Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 October 2004 05:43
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Erwien Samantha Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 07:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Page
> Subject: update for id_ID Translation
>
> Dear All,
>
> I finish update the id_ID translation,
> Here's the attachment.
Thanks - update a
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Say I have some code in a script that looks like:
mv pgadmin3.tgz pgadmin3-${VERSION}.tgz
When configure runs, it then changes that to:
mv pgadmin3.tgz pgadmin3-1.1.0.tgz
Rather than change it of course, it could take /script.in/ and create
/scr
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Adam H.
Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 October 2003
13:48To: Dave PageCc: pgadmin-hackersSubject:
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] UpdateDave Page wrote:
Say I have some code in a script that looks like:
mv
Dave Page wrote:
Message
Say I have some code in a script that looks
like:
mv pgadmin3.tgz pgadmin3-${VERSION}.tgz
When configure runs, it then changes that to:
mv pgadmin3.tgz pgadmin3-1.1.0.tgz
Rather than change it of course, it could
take script.in and cr
Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Adam H.
Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 October 2003
13:37To: Dave PageCc: pgadmin-hackersSubject:
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] UpdateDave Page wrote:
It would be cool if there were a generic mechanism we could use to write
Dave Page wrote:
It would be cool if there were a generic mechanism we could use to write
the version number into scripts 'n' stuff at configure time. The would
certainly make my life easier with various build scripts.
By "write them into scripts" what do you mean? Can you provide an
exam
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 October 2003 16:07
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Update
>
>
> Hello everyone! I've been out of town for the weekend, so I
> wasn't able
&
Hello everyone! I've been out of town for the weekend, so I wasn't able
to work on any pgAdmin stuff while I was gone. I'm going to get back
into it, so I wanted to make sure that I've got everything on my to-do list:
*) Fix -DSSL compilation problem
*) Make static build more static
*) Fix J-M
31 matches
Mail list logo
