Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Support the new check_option parameter of views

2014-07-09 Thread J.F. Oster
Hello Guillaume, I've noticed that views for which I had never specified check_option or security_barrier (in pgsql 9.3) have got incorrect DDL generated - the WITH (options) clause is empty: CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW account_v WITH () AS SELECT acc.id, ... Once I set security_barrier on and back

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Support the new check_option parameter of views

2014-07-09 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Hi, 2014-07-09 17:08 GMT+02:00 J.F. Oster jinfros...@mail.ru: Hello Guillaume, I've noticed that views for which I had never specified check_option or security_barrier (in pgsql 9.3) have got incorrect DDL generated - the WITH (options) clause is empty: CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW account_v

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Support the new check_option parameter of views

2014-07-02 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Support the new check_option parameter of views Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=178f27be48c6c1af970a104d590e4d3abaccdcc4 Modified Files -- CHANGELOG |1 + pgadmin/dlg/dlgView.cpp |