Andreas Pflug wrote:
> I investigated this point, and indeed you answered that mail (last year
> on Sep 19th). You didn't react to my code offer in that mail though.
In which case I can only assume I misread that part.
> When it's about anything non-pgadmin related, I only can repeat the last
> s
Dave Page wrote:
>> My offer to get and
>> review my changes in order to extract them for the official pgAdmin
>> never got an answer.
>>
>
> I honestly never received such an email, and would have been glad to
> accept had I done. As for leaving the team, you unsubscribed from all
> the maili
Knut P. Lehre wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> If it is all your own code then of course, you can do as you wish.
>> But as I pointed out, the base classes you said you were using were
>> originally based on other classes written by myself and others.
>
> I believed the intention of the Artistic Lice
Dave Page wrote:>If it is all your own code then of course, you can do as you
wish. But>as I pointed out, the base classes you said you were using
were>originally based on other classes written by myself and others.I believed
the intention of the Artistic License was not to prevent usage of part
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> OMG. Can you imagine I feel I can't use my own code as I wish?
If it is all your own code then of course, you can do as you wish. But
as I pointed out, the base classes you said you were using were
originally based on other classes written by myself and others.
> For peace
Dave Page wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>> Dave whatsup?
>>
>
> I'm trying to do three things (in no particular order):
>
> 1) Change the pgAdmin licence to Artistic 2.0 and above.
>
> You are the only developer who has refused permission to do that,
> however that is your right and we wi
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Dave whatsup?
I'm trying to do three things (in no particular order):
1) Change the pgAdmin licence to Artistic 2.0 and above.
You are the only developer who has refused permission to do that,
however that is your right and we will respect it.
2) Protect the rights of tho
Dave Page wrote:
>
>> --- Original Message ---
>> From: Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: 12/10/07, 22:11:36
>> Subject: Re: pgAdmin licence
>>
>> Dave,
>> since pgImport was originally written to import from file to MSSQL, with
>> pgsql supp
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 12/10/07, 22:11:36
> Subject: Re: pgAdmin licence
>
> Dave,
> since pgImport was originally written to import from file to MSSQL, with
> pgsql support added later (and pgConne
Dave,
since pgImport was originally written to import from file to MSSQL, with
pgsql support added later (and pgConnection/pgSet never supported COPY),
you're trying to see stuff that's not there (nor is factory.cpp).
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)
Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>
> I don't think so. It was me who invented the db base classes, besides
> they have undergone some major rewrite (ever heard of pgSetIterator?)
> I checked quite thoroughly, including the icon (which I'd replace if I
> had another one at hand).
You invented the abstracti
Dave Page wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>
>> No. You removed VC6 support, which was absolutely vital for me, without
>> ever asking whether that was viable. Since my development was tightly
>> integrated, I wasn't able to switch one of projects separately (at least
>> in the timeframe availabl
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> No. You removed VC6 support, which was absolutely vital for me, without
> ever asking whether that was viable. Since my development was tightly
> integrated, I wasn't able to switch one of projects separately (at least
> in the timeframe available).
Oh, I'm sorry - I though
Dave Page wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>> for me the worst case already happened last year, when I had to fork my
>> own code to continue my job. As a consequence, I won't give away control
>> over sources any more for tools I release to the public, such as
>> www.pse-consulting.de/pg/pgImpor
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> for me the worst case already happened last year, when I had to fork my
> own code to continue my job. As a consequence, I won't give away control
> over sources any more for tools I release to the public, such as
> www.pse-consulting.de/pg/pgImport.zip.
I find that an incre
Dave Page wrote:
> This email has been sent to you because our records indicate that at
> some point in the past you have contributed to the pgAdmin III project
> (http://www.pgadmin.org). It this is not the case, please let me know as
> soon as possible.
>
> Since it was first released, pgAdmin II
16 matches
Mail list logo
