Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
Hello, On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 01:36 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote: What version of GNOME are you running? 2.16 on Fedora Core 6. On my 2.14 installation the pgAdmin III entry shows up under Programming just fine. However, on my fresh 2.16 installation it only shows up if I add that Categories line. Works for me on my environment. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
Devrim, I'm not sure I understand. Are you not seeing this problem with 1.6.2, or are you suggesting my patch be applied to 1.6.2? As far as I can tell it would be fine to simply update in the trunk and wait for this to propagate in the next release. Nathan Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 07:59 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164249 It works for me for 1.6.2 -- I'm not sure that 1.4.3 needs a backpatch for this. Dave? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ - No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
Nathan Egge wrote: I just filed a bug against pgadmin3 for a missing line in pkg/pgadmin3.desktop and was asked to file upstream. This is a trivial bug and the details can be found here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164249 Thanks, patch applied to the 1.6 branch and trunk. Regards, Dave ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
What version of GNOME are you running? On my 2.14 installation the pgAdmin III entry shows up under Programming just fine. However, on my fresh 2.16 installation it only shows up if I add that Categories line. I guess I'm confused about how it was correctly placed on my 2.14 installation. There must be some configuration file that explicitly placed pgadmin3.dekstop in the right Application.directory. Any ideas? Nathan Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:20 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote: Are you not seeing this problem with 1.6.2, or are you suggesting my patch be applied to 1.6.2? The former. REgards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
I believe I've answered my own question. The pgadmin3-1.2.2.ebuild contains
the following 3 lines that are not in the pgadmin3-1.4.3.ebuild:
dodir /usr/share/applnk/Development
cp ${S}/pkg/pgadmin3.desktop ${D}/usr/share/applnk/Development/pgadmin3.desktop
chmod 644 ${D}/usr/share/applnk/Development/pgadmin3.desktop
The applnk dir is scanned for additional .desktop files to explicitly include
based on the file system hierarchy, see the following:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s07.html
This method of categorizing .desktop (placing them in the /applnk directory)
entries been deprecated in favor of the Categories line.
I hope this has cleared up any confusion.
Nathan
Nathan Egge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What version of GNOME are you running?
On my 2.14 installation the pgAdmin III entry shows up under Programming just
fine. However, on my fresh 2.16 installation it only shows up if I add that
Categories line.
I guess I'm confused about how it was correctly placed on my 2.14 installation.
There must be some configuration file that explicitly placed pgadmin3.dekstop
in the right Application.directory.
Any ideas?
Nathan
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:20 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote:
Are you not seeing this problem with 1.6.2, or are you suggesting my
patch be applied to 1.6.2?
The former.
REgards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
-
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
-
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
[pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
I just filed a bug against pgadmin3 for a missing line in pkg/pgadmin3.desktop and was asked to file upstream. This is a trivial bug and the details can be found here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164249 Thanks, Nathan - Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
Hi, On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 07:59 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164249 It works for me for 1.6.2 -- I'm not sure that 1.4.3 needs a backpatch for this. Dave? Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3.desktop patch
Hi, On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:20 -0800, Nathan Egge wrote: Are you not seeing this problem with 1.6.2, or are you suggesting my patch be applied to 1.6.2? The former. REgards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
