On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/14/2017 01:01 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Setting up in server mode by following those docs takes just a few
> minutes.
> >
> >
> > Six months ago, I jumped on this with the goal of solving it, partly
> > through use of linux cont
On 07/14/2017 11:35 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I don't know how simple you consider uwsgi, but it's certainly well
> packaged and maintained in my experience. Now granted that experience is
> mostly on debian based platform so it might differ on redhat families,
> but it seems likely.
I remembe
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/14/2017 08:04 AM, Robert Eckhardt wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > I'd be interested in knowing what specific things could be done to make
> > you think that the Web version is no longer the 'ugly stepchild'.
> >
> > If I consider our (Pivotal's
On 07/14/2017 08:04 AM, Robert Eckhardt wrote:
> Josh,
>
> I'd be interested in knowing what specific things could be done to make
> you think that the Web version is no longer the 'ugly stepchild'.
>
> If I consider our (Pivotal's) current development process then the most
> honest thing we co
On 07/14/2017 01:01 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Setting up in server mode by following those docs takes just a few minutes.
>
>
> Six months ago, I jumped on this with the goal of solving it, partly
> through use of linux containers. However, I'm full stop because of the
> emphasis on (a
I'm somewhat unclear as to what the desired behavior is supposed to be from
the writeup of that Redmine issue.
If I were to guess what was wanted it would be a slightly different build
that included a container that had:
- Python preconfigured
- Apache HTTPD configured
- Then had the app
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 09:01 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Right - your suggestion there was reverted because it became quickly
> clear
> > that it broke the default desktop mode.
>
> What if I invent an optional "pgadmin4-v1-web-se
Hi,
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 09:01 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Right - your suggestion there was reverted because it became quickly clear
> that it broke the default desktop mode.
What if I invent an optional "pgadmin4-v1-web-setup" (or whatever) package,
that does what Josh suggested?
Regards,
--
Josh,
I'd be interested in knowing what specific things could be done to make you
think that the Web version is no longer the 'ugly stepchild'.
If I consider our (Pivotal's) current development process then the most
honest thing we could say is that the desktop application is our
afterthought. Al
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Installing pgadmin-for-web is painful, poorly documented, and broken.
> As a result, it's not considered a real UI by anyone not on this team.
>
Have you re-read the docs since I told you some time back that I was
updating them? As
10 matches
Mail list logo