On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:42 PM Apple Pine wrote:
> hello,
>
> why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7.
>
> in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use
> tool for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the
> version number.
>
> it should be able t
Hi Darren
Issue 1: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/9090 SSH Tunnel not
working as Paramiko releases a new version.
Issue 2: https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/9095 Migration was
failing while upgrading to v9.7.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:00 AM Darren Duncan
wrote:
> Ca
Can you briefly explain what those two major issues are?
In particular, whether users should stay on version 9.6 in the meantime because
of them?
Darren Duncan
On 2025-08-28 12:08 a.m., Akshay Joshi wrote:
Hi All,
Due to two major issues in pgAdmin v9.7, we are planning an early release of
hello,
why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7.
in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use tool
for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the version
number.
it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin 4
in the versi
hello,
why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7.
in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use tool
for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the version
number.
it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin 4
in the versi
Hi All,
Due to two major issues in pgAdmin v9.7, we are planning an early release
of v9.8 on 4th September.
Akshay Joshi
Principal Engineer | Engineering Manager | pgAdmin Hacker
enterprisedb.com
* Blog*: https://www.enterprisedb.com/akshay-joshi
* GitHub*: https://github.com/akshay-joshi
*
