Am 14. Juli 2017 12:48:16 MESZ schrieb Raymond O'Donnell :
>Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to install pgAdmin4 in server mode on my laptop (Debian
>Jessie), and I've got as far as:
>
>python setup.py
>
>I don't have a python environment set up, so I'm apt-getting my way
>through various unmet dependen
Re: francis cherat 2017-08-11
> Hi,
>
>
> some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
>
>
> exppgs 17769 1 0 01:06 ?00:01:04 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres
> -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.
> exppgs 39922 17769 0 15:39 ?
Re: Alasdair Campbell 2017-10-10 <20171010113716.cesg7rwsm2a6o4q3@COLONEL-K>
> I was just wondering if packaging the missing Python modules for Debian
> had been abandoned / forgotten about with the release of pgAdmin4 v2 and
> PostgreSQL 10. Trent was trying to build a deb for pgAdmin4 and ran int
Re: Johann Spies 2018-01-31 <20180131064747.ga15...@sun.ac.za>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:31:32PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your response, Johann.
> >
> > I'm probably being stupid, but I can't find those packages... I've
> > been hunting in
> > https://apt.postgresql.o
Re: Dave Page 2018-01-26
> For those that may not watch -announce
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Christoph Berg
> Date: Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:20 PM
> Subject: pgAdmin4 2.1 on apt.postgresql.org
> To: PostgreSQL Announce
>
>
> pgAdmin 4
Re: Dave Page 2018-01-31
> Thanks Christoph. I've updated the text on the website to read:
>
> DEBs for Debian Stretch and Ubuntu Xenial and later are available from the
> PostgreSQL apt repository.
>
> Please let me know if you want to change that at all.
That's fine, thanks. Sorry for gettin
Re: Wim Bertels 2018-03-01 <1519914667070.37...@ucll.be>
> Hallo Christoph,
>
> on debian stable i now get:
>
> $ pgadmin4
> Python path: "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages"
> Python Home: ""
> Webapp path: "/usr/share/pgadmin4/web/pgAdmin4.py"
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/flask_migrate/__i
Re: Johann Spies 2018-04-18 <20180418070316.ga18...@sun.ac.za>
> Since the availability of 4.2 on Debian (pgdg-version) I could use
> pgadmin4 in the desktop-mode. Today I have upgraded to 4.3 and now I am
> back in the web browser - which I do not want.
>
> Do I have to reconfigure the system ev
Re: David Gilman 2018-05-27
> The error is intermittent, it seems that by restart apache you can
> sometimes make it work but right now I seem to be in a situation where I
> can't get pgadmin4 to start at all.
> Flask-HTMLmin==1.3.2
> htmlmin==0.1.11
You need htmlmin 0.1.12:
https://github.com
While updating the Debian package I noticed that pgadmin requires at
least cmake 3.3:
CMake Error at cmake/FindBoost.cmake:238 (cmake_policy):
Policy "CMP0057" is not known to this version of CMake.
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.3/policy/CMP0057.html
CMake 3.3 adds support for the new
Uh, the subject should of course have been "[pgagent]"...
Re: To pgAdmin III support 2018-07-20 <20180720085156.ga15...@msg.df7cb.de>
> While updating the Debian package I noticed that pgadmin requires at
> least cmake 3.3:
>
> CMake Error at cmake/FindBoost.cmake:238 (cmake_policy):
> Poli
All non-x868 architectures need -pthread to link with threads:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pgagent&ver=4.0.0-1&suite=sid
This patch fixes the problem:
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ ENDIF(WIN32)
ADD_EXECUTABLE(pgagent ${_srcs})
TARGET_LINK_LIBR
Hi,
in the Debian package I notice that CMakeLists.txt installs README and
LICENSE to /usr (no subdirectory!), and pgagent.sql to /usr/share.
The first is clearly wrong, and the second somewhat debatable. As
pgagent.sql is not really required (extension support), I added this
patch:
Don't install
The Debian package includes a regression test for pgagent which might
be useful for others as well. It installs a simple job, fires up
pgagent for 80 s (using `timeout` from coreutils), and checks if the
job was run at least once.
Christoph
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+PG_CON
Re: Dave Page 2018-07-20
> Yes, at minimum I suspect. Does it complain if it's there on x86 Linux?
> Christoph said he needed it on non-x86 archs.
It's needed on non-x86 Linux, but does not complain on x86 (and I
think it's good style to use it there as well).
Christoph
Hi,
the Debian ftp masters pointed out that the pldebugger license is
ambiguous: The source code states this:
Licence
---
The pl/pgsql debugger API is released under the Artistic Licence.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php
Copyright (c) 2004-2017 EnterpriseDB Corpo
Re: Dave Page 2018-10-25
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Any chance you can have a look at this please? It seems almost certainly a
> bug in the Debian packaging (we've had some Redmine tickets about it too:
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3686).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:29 PM Ma
Re: Akshay Joshi 2019-04-10
> Notable changes in this release include:
Fwiw, this release broke compatibility with the sphinx version in
Ubuntu xenial (16.04), 1.3.6-2ubuntu1.2.
10:12:20 reading sources... [ 99%] using_pgagent
10:12:20 reading sources... [100%] view_dialog
10:12:20
10:12:20
1
Re: Dave Page 2019-04-11
> > Fwiw, this release broke compatibility with the sphinx version in
> > Ubuntu xenial (16.04), 1.3.6-2ubuntu1.2.
>
> Hmm, that was changed in 4.4. I assume Xenial has an ancient version of
> Sphinx?
1.3, as said above.
> Can a newer version be used for running the bu
reading sources... [ 95%] unique_constraint_dialog
reading sources... [ 96%] user_interface
reading sources... [ 97%] user_management
reading sources... [ 98%] user_mapping_dialog
reading sources... [ 99%] using_pgagent
reading sources... [100%] view_dialog
Warning, treated as error:
/home/cbe/pr
Re: To pgAdmin III support 2019-06-04 <20190604124400.ga4...@msg.df7cb.de>
> The problem is in docs/en_US/build_code_snippet.py:
Christoph
--- a/docs/en_US/build_code_snippet.py
+++ b/docs/en_US/build_code_snippet.py
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ This document contains code for some of
below:\n\n""")
for
Re: Dave Page 2019-06-05
> This just works around the problem, and will result in incomplete docs. The
> correct solution is to ensure that you have the application dependencies
> installed in the environment in which you build the docs (it's actually a
> subset of them - you probably just need t
Hi,
in the master password entry popup, it would be awesome if I could
simply hit Enter to confirm.
Christoph
Re: Dave Page 2019-06-05
> > Second: When I click the "?" button on that dialog box it takes me to this
> > page:
> > "http://127.0.0.1:33681/help/help/master_password.html";
> > Which returns "404 Not Found"
> >
>
> That sounds like an issue with the packaging - that file is certainly there
> i
Re: Fahar Abbas 2019-06-25
> > I've Installed pgAdmin from APT repository and while others can get it to
> > work simply I get an error in the screen attached below whenever I try to
> > take a backup or restore from pgAdmin
That's https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/4088
The packages use pyt
Re: To Fahar Abbas 2019-06-25 <20190625100525.ga11...@msg.df7cb.de>
> That's https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/4088
>
> The packages use python3, and I haven't yet told the pgadmin4 backup
> machinery to do that as well. (At least that's what I think the
> problem is, haven't investigated yet.
Re: Khushboo Vashi 2019-07-24
> When are you planning to update the pgAdmin 4 packages?
Hi,
I just put 4.10 live.
Christoph
Re: Akshay Joshi 2019-07-25
> The pgAdmin Development Team are pleased to announce pgAdmin 4 version 4.11.
> This release of pgAdmin 4 includes over 34 bug fixes and new features. For
^
That part of the announcement mail always makes me chuckl
Re: Dave Page 2020-04-24
> Python 2 has been unsupported for a few months now.
>
> Does anyone object to dropping Python 2 support in pgAdmin? This primarily
> affects our Python package - other installers and packages all use Python 3
> I believe.
I've always been using Python 3 only for the p
Re: Dave Page
> Please try using the packages the pgAdmin development team produce. We
> started building them a few releases ago because of issues such as these
> that were not getting resolved.
It's also true that pgadmin is the only package that needs this level
of nannying from packagers, and
30 matches
Mail list logo
