I don't think this is really a PgAdmin problem. PgAdmin is running the
postgres function pg_logdir_ls()
which is defined (on my server) as:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_logdir_ls()
RETURNS SETOF record AS
'$libdir/admin81', 'pg_logdir_ls'
LANGUAGE 'c' VOLATILE STRICT;
So there is some intera
PostgreSQL 8.1.9 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.2.3
20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-58)
I am not the admin that installs or runs the server. This server (and the
others below) are at another institution.
NOTE: I have access other servers which do not cause this particular
problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes I do.
BR,
Pedro Doria Meunier
GSM: +351 96 17 20 188
Skype: pdoriam
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le mercredi 8 juillet 2009 à 11:06:43, Pedro Doria Meunier a écrit
> :
>> [...] As for me running the below select returns "1".
>>
>
> Can you che
Le mercredi 8 juillet 2009 à 11:06:43, Pedro Doria Meunier a écrit :
> [...]
> As for me running the below select returns "1".
>
Can you check if you still have the error without the adminpack?
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-support mailing l
Le mercredi 8 juillet 2009 à 16:09:15, Michael Shapiro a écrit :
> The query
> select count(*) from pg_proc where proname='pg_file_write';
> returns 1
>
Which release of PostgreSQL are you using? Did you change it? (I'm thinking
about a 8.1 to something upgrade). Because the error message says yo
The query
select count(*) from pg_proc where proname='pg_file_write';
returns 1
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le mardi 7 juillet 2009 à 23:47:18, Michael Shapiro a écrit :
> > I have no idea. Would this be part of the postgres server or part of
> > PgAdmin?
> >
>
> Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael,
you install the admin pack like this:
psql yourdatabase < /usr/share/pgsql/contrib/ adminpack.sql
As for me running the below select returns "1".
As per David suggestion, i.e. building pgadmin3 with debug support,
I'm afraid that my wxWidg
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le mercredi 8 juillet 2009 à 10:13:05, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume
>>
>> Lelarge wrote:
>> > Raphaël is not supposed to work on this? or does he "only" do the Debian
>> > package? I CC-ed him, just in c
Le mercredi 8 juillet 2009 à 10:13:05, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume
>
> Lelarge wrote:
> > Raphaël is not supposed to work on this? or does he "only" do the Debian
> > package? I CC-ed him, just in case.
>
> Well Raph unfortunately doesn't have time to maintain t
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume
Lelarge wrote:
> Raphaël is not supposed to work on this? or does he "only" do the Debian
> package? I CC-ed him, just in case.
Well Raph unfortunately doesn't have time to maintain the APT repos
these days I don't think. I think what we need to do is re
Hi ,
I want to lock the table from select query .
After locking , Other process can do update or insert but it should not do
select query .
what is the mode of lock I have to use .
I have used ACCESS EXCLUSIVE . But it lock update statement too ..
what I have to do implement this scenario ?
w
11 matches
Mail list logo
