Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-14 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Shira Bezalel wrote: > Hi Dave. > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Jack Royal-Gordon >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > First, I appreciate your tone of constructive criticism — there has been >> >

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-13 Thread Shira Bezalel
Hi Dave. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Jack Royal-Gordon > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > First, I appreciate your tone of constructive criticism — there has been > way > > too much negative criticism on this topic. However, as another user

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-12 Thread Mike Surcouf
I am on windows and installed pgadmin server side using the pgadmin4-v1-web package and then use browser to access. It’s a bit more work but I am happy with pgadmin4 after that. 4 second startup expanding nodes sub second. You also have the added benefit of a single install for the network,. IMH

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-12 Thread marcelo
Astonishing... On 12/06/17 07:31, Dave Page wrote: To which the answer is that having invested $1M+ in pgAdmin 4, -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-12 Thread Mike Surcouf
09:38 To: Jack Royal-Gordon Cc: pgAdmin Support Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin. Hi On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Jack Royal-Gordon wrote: > Hi, > > First, I appreciate your tone of constructive criticism — there has > be

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-12 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM, wrote: > I don't have any anti-virus software or anything like that besides the > built-in stuff. Even my own NW.js programs seem to run smoothly on this > machine (NW.js is like a stripped Chromium in which you can run JS programs > as if they were a desktop app

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-12 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Jack Royal-Gordon wrote: > Hi, > > First, I appreciate your tone of constructive criticism — there has been way > too much negative criticism on this topic. However, as another user who has > his own experiences with pgAdmin4, I feel compelled to reply regardin

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-11 Thread Melvin Davidson
Pawel, I am NOT Pgadmin support, but I tried your query in PgAdmin 4 v1.5 andI saw the following error returned. ERROR: relation "non_existing_table" does not existLINE 1: select * from non_existing_table; ^** Error **ERROR: relation "non_existing_table" does not existSQL state:

Re: [pgadmin-support] Serious feedback and questions about the future of pgAdmin.

2017-06-11 Thread Pawel Hadam
Hi All, Not sure if this is a version related or I am doing something wrong. Let's say I query a non-existing table. I am expecting to see an SQL error message saying that the table does not exist. And this is what I can see in pgAdmin III. Unfortunately, pgAdmin 4 does not show any reasonable mes