I really don't know. JDBC communication is being handled by a JDO library,
so I don't know which one is doing this, but I suspect about JDO. I feel
like asking about it in the forums there, but then I'd like to know: is
there any performance (disk, read/write speed...) difference between storing
la
On 02/10/2009 12:55, mad rug wrote:
> I really don't know. JDBC communication is being handled by a JDO
> library, so I don't know which one is doing this, but I suspect about
> JDO. I feel like asking about it in the forums there, but then I'd like
> to know: is there any performance (disk, read/w
When any server configuration parameters (or variables) are set on a
per-function basis, the script displayed in the pgAdmin SQL pane looks like
this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... ;
ALTER FUNCTION ... SET ...;
If then I edit the function body and save my work, all variables are lost,
since (
Yes, I'll go for pure TEXT objects. I read this performance tip about TEXT
on the docs, makes me like Postgres :-)Anyway, I just checked alternative
types for character data, and tested JDBC type LONGVARCHAR, and now the data
is being stored directly to the TEXT field. Just configuration after all,
I have this strange Error between my PgAdmin V1.10.0 Windows Release
and my Posgresql server 8.0.22 when i click on trigger Functions...
Vic
--
Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgad
