Hi all!
I'm trying to upgrade from 7.3.2 to 7.4.3 but I've a problem with a
database (1 I know, there could be more) containing a table with an oid
type field.
I run the migration doing:
../bin/pg_dumpall -o -p 5432 | /apps/pgs-7.4.3/bin/psql -d template1 -p
5433 1/tmp/out 2/tmp/err
The
Hello all!
I apologise in advance if any of my questions are in a FAQ somewhere - I
haven't seen them...
Does anyone know when (if ever) replication support will be added to the
main PostgreSQL codebase? Is there any chance it'll be included in the
upcoming 7.5 release?
I've taken a look at the
After a long battle with technology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Browne), an earthling,
wrote:
I apologise in advance if any of my questions are in a FAQ somewhere - I
haven't seen them...
Does anyone know when (if ever) replication support will be added to the
main PostgreSQL codebase? Is there
On 06 July 2004 16:41, Christopher Browne wrote:
I've taken a look at the replication solutions already available,
including the sterling effort made on Slony-I, but we're really
looking for integrated, base-level support rather than an add-in.
The problem is that replication doesn't
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Matt Browne wrote:
On 06 July 2004 16:41, Christopher Browne wrote:
I've taken a look at the replication solutions already available,
including the sterling effort made on Slony-I, but we're really
looking for integrated, base-level support rather than an add-in.
The problem is
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all, be
all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen different ones
out there ...
It would be unwise for *anyone* to state never as far as inclusion of
built-in replication, but since
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:07:33 -0300 (ADT), Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be unwise for *anyone* to state never as far as inclusion of
built-in replication, but since the general consensus is that there is no
such thing as the 'all-encompassing solution' for this, the chances
Christopher Browne wrote:
Jan Wieck puts it fairly nicely:
The number of different replication solutions available supports
the theory that ``one size fits all'' is not true when it comes to
database replication.
The fact that all but one or two replication solutions out there are
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all,
be all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen
different ones out there ...
Which ones are you thinking of in your count? I don't get anywhere near
half a dozen.
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all,
be all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen
different ones out there ...
Which ones are you thinking of in your count? I don't get anywhere
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all,
be all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen
different ones out there ...
Which ones are you thinking of
Hi
I am hoping posgresql will get more widely used.
I have an idea for an application.
Consider , after spending months collecting email with information for
research there becomes the need to catalog it
and store it efficiently. A lot of it is scientific and engineering related.
Is there an
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:30:46 -0400, Paul Gimpelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am hoping posgresql will get more widely used.
Aren't we all?
I have an idea for an application...
I'm not sure this is the most appropriate list for such a discussion.
pgsql-admin is for discussions related to
13 matches
Mail list logo
