David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to run pgsql through a tunnel.
[snip]
Through an ssh tunnel, using port-forwarding, I'm guessing?
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
Can you "psql -p 5432" on the machine on which the server is running?
Here's what I just did successf
David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and on the ssh'd terminal tunnel session:
>
> $ channel 3: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
> ---
Perhaps a firewalling problem? Look at your kernel packet filtering
setup ... it's not uncommon for even local-loopback traf
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:21:24PM -0700, Steve Crawford wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 August 2004 4:13 pm, David Bear wrote:
> > I'm attempting to run pgsql through a tunnel. I'm using the default
> > pg_hba.conf file for now which has the relevant information:
> >
> >
> > local all
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 4:13 pm, David Bear wrote:
> I'm attempting to run pgsql through a tunnel. I'm using the default
> pg_hba.conf file for now which has the relevant information:
>
>
> local all all
> trust
> hostall all 127.0.0.1 255.255.
I'm attempting to run pgsql through a tunnel. I'm using the default
pg_hba.conf file for now which has the relevant information:
local all all
trust
hostall all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
trust
I assume this means that the back end wi
Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, *Marc* is working on including less stuff; the rest of us don't
necessarily agree. In particular I've got to re-incorporate any major
pieces that get removed from the core distribution, since people expect
to find those in the RPM set. (In principle I supp
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
> spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
> the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
> seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc
Tom Lane wrote:
Well, *Marc* is working on including less stuff; the rest of us don't
necessarily agree. In particular I've got to re-incorporate any major
pieces that get removed from the core distribution, since people expect
to find those in the RPM set. (In principle I suppose they could be
h
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In the PG case a
>> single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
>> pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.
> How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
> working on
Tom Lane wrote:
> In the PG case a
> single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
> pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.
How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
working on including less stuff?
> The init script is a differen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you share the data-definitions of your project(s) when they change
(template1) ? Do you create all system-tables at pg_init runtime, and thus
diff the C-source?
The best approach IMHO is to use cvs and diff. For a more PHP-centric
approach, you could look at ADO
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:09:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do you share the data-definitions of your project(s) when they
> change (template1) ? Do you create all system-tables at pg_init
> runtime, and thus diff the C-source?
We track all DDL in CVS and manually create "patches" t
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't there a way to generate this automatically? Why isn't the .spec
> file (and the debian directory, for that matter) part of the source
> tree?
Can't speak for Debian, but Red Hat at least would not use such a spec
file anyway. RH's procedures inv
Hello Group,
This question has been brought up on various mailing lists, but without
any definite answers if I am correct.
I am working on a system that can be used to rapidly create simple to
medium complex applications in PHP. It basically features a forms-system,
a reporting system, and databa
Dave Cramer wrote:
Jerome,
I'm curious what you expect out of clustering. High Availability, and
Load Balancing seem possible, but Performance ? I would think there is a
cost associated with clustering, that degrades performance.
Anyways, to answer your question, there are a few tools that allow Hi
Jerome,
I'm curious what you expect out of clustering. High Availability, and
Load Balancing seem possible, but Performance ? I would think there is a
cost associated with clustering, that degrades performance.
Anyways, to answer your question, there are a few tools that allow High
Availability,
Hi All,
I just came off an exibit and I was wondering if there ways to do clustering
in postgres.
I envy mySQL because there's a application for clustering it...
EMIC networks has this marketing tagline:
High Availability - Performace Scalability - Dyanami
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:27:58PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)
> >
> >>Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
> >>/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. w
18 matches
Mail list logo
