On 29.05.2006, at 22:27 Uhr, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Are there any known issues related to compiling for OS X on Intel?
No issues I know about. But I have only build it once on our test
MacBook Pro.
cug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forg
None. Using postgresql 8.1.3 on my Intel MacBook right now. Works great.
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
http://ww
Are there any known issues related to compiling for OS X on Intel?
Thanks
Peter
Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 29.05.2006, at 19:56 Uhr, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
Now finally getting comfortable on the new PowerBook, and after weeks
of whining about no OS X packages I discovered the fink binaries,
which
On 29.05.2006, at 19:56 Uhr, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
Now finally getting comfortable on the new PowerBook, and after weeks
of whining about no OS X packages I discovered the fink binaries,
which I dutifully installed last night.
Bad idea. They are normally old, install in stupid locations, are not
Hi gang,
Now finally getting comfortable on the new PowerBook, and after weeks
of whining about no OS X packages I discovered the fink binaries,
which I dutifully installed last night.
However I have no idea where I am in the install process afterwards,
as there is no 'postgres' user and such -
Daniel Drotos wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >If you could identify which file is which, you could manually
> >reconstruct the directories, but I'm afraid the odds of doing that
>
> Postgresql data files do not identifying themselves (in their content)
> so it's an ext2fs prob
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
If you could identify which file is which, you could manually
reconstruct the directories, but I'm afraid the odds of doing that
Postgresql data files do not identifying themselves (in their content)
so it's an ext2fs problem. I'm trying to solve it, just
Daniel Drotos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> During machine maintenance I've made 'rm -rf *' on postgres data
> directory by a (very stupid) mistake. Postmaster was not running that
> time.
> Using e2undel I dumped out contents of deleted files (3728 files have
> been deleted by that command). Be
tough luck .. could u query the unix groups and see if u could retrive the original filenames and directory structure ?.
On 5/29/06, Daniel Drotos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,During machine maintenance I've made 'rm -rf *' on postgres datadirectory by a (very stupid) mistake. Postmaster was n
Hi,
During machine maintenance I've made 'rm -rf *' on postgres data
directory by a (very stupid) mistake. Postmaster was not running that
time.
Using e2undel I dumped out contents of deleted files (3728 files have
been deleted by that command). Because of "rm -r", sizes of recovered
direct
10 matches
Mail list logo
