Hi,
I am using XA datasource and trying to connect to Postgresql database
over SSL. Application server being used is Jboss eap 4.3. I am getting
error like:
Caused by: org.jboss.resource.JBossResourceException: Could not find
accessor on XADataSource: ; - nested throwable:
(java.lang.NoSuchMeth
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:49:49AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I've changed my approach by revoking rights to schema public
>> > from PUBLIC
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:49:49AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've changed my approach by revoking rights to schema public
> > from PUBLIC in the template1, and then granting all rights
> > to again just to the "main"
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:55:27AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I think the whole "security through obscurity" argument is a cop out
> >> to
> >> get
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think the whole "security through obscurity" argument is a cop out to
>> get around postgresql's design choices (in this perticular instance anyway,
>> in m
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've changed my approach by revoking rights to schema public
> from PUBLIC in the template1, and then granting all rights
> to again just to the "main" user, and usage rights to
> the additional users.
>
> So people aren't
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> You'll likely want to make the database owned by that role.
My intention is to have some sort of "main"-user who'll be
able to do whatever they want (because they create
all the objects) and a number of additional users
that only have the r
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 11:48:10 Thomas Jacob wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 08:57 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > Well, databases are designed to be accessed by people you trust to not
> > do really stupid things that can affect the other users.
>
> Well, in a shared
> I am also curious as to why an SQL dump from the production
> server would
> come out to 2.8G but a dump of an exact replica on a test
> box would come
> out to 3.0G. What determines the size and makeup of an SQL
> dump?
Why not repeat the dump without any compression then compare them with a f
