On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:57 +0100, Sylvain Avril wrote:
> I think you should read this and especially article 18 and 19 of
> this :
> http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Interesting read, thanks.
OT: I see that Article 27 (2) appears to run directly counter to open
source software. And it wou
Harald Fuchs escribió:
> In article <20090204165933.gb32...@alvh.no-ip.org>,
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>
> > Marc Mamin wrote:
> >> There are 2 features that would be helpfull in my case:
> >>
> >> - define vacuum properties on table groups rather than on given tables:
> > Hmm. I'm not really s
I think you should read this and especially article 18 and 19 of this :
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
But yes you can argue that it was inspired by a previous declaration of a
silly group of frenchs :-).
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Scott Runnion wrote:
> As a subscriber to many po
further ,
can pg_buffercache view serve as a guide to setting appropriate
value of shared_buffers ?
when i do
SELECT count(*) from pg_buffercache where relfilenode is null ;
to check unused buffers i find that it has been 0 most of the
time. Can shared_buffers be raised to an extent that some buf
Hi ,
I have following setting in my postgresql.conf file.
shared_buffers = 1 (8k blocks) ; which is apprx 80MB
my question is how can i know how much is the usage
of the shared_buffers so that it can be increased or
decreased. below is the output of ipcs , I am wondering
is postgres using
In article <20090204165933.gb32...@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Marc Mamin wrote:
>> There are 2 features that would be helpfull in my case:
>>
>> - define vacuum properties on table groups rather than on given tables:
>>
>> For example, I don't want to vacuum daily tables which ca
