What is it?
Why don't you tell us?
The exact name of the file might be useful information, too.
It is : postgres/8.3/main/base/16385/2613
Thanks.
Ciao Dirk.
DISCLAIMER:
Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is
privileged and confidential, and is intended
Le 10/07/2010 12:43, Neuber, Dirk a écrit :
What is it?
Why don't you tell us?
The exact name of the file might be useful information, too.
It is : postgres/8.3/main/base/16385/2613
This is a system catalog, pg_largeobject, which holds binary objects. If
you use Large Objects, no
Not to the database itself, you don't; and it's probably killing
performance for you to try to do that. You should use your
connection pooler to funnel that many client-side connections down
to a much smaller number of database connections. Your pgpool
configuration doesn't seem to be doing
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
I'm wondering about the differences when the failover situation
occurs. From reading the docs, I get the impression that 9.0's
streaming replication might be faster than 8.4's WAL shipping, but
otherwise offers the same level of data protection.
Is there a difference in
Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info writes:
Le 10/07/2010 12:43, Neuber, Dirk a écrit :
The exact name of the file might be useful information, too.
It is : postgres/8.3/main/base/16385/2613
This is a system catalog, pg_largeobject, which holds binary objects. If
you use Large
