Hi guys, I have a Kerberos problem connecting from windows XP SP3 to a
postgresql 8.1.18 database running on rhel 5.5.
Pgadmin3 says Error connecting to the server: pg_krb5_init:
krb5_cc_get_principal: No credential cache found
I have the variable PGKRBSRVNAME set to POSTGRES (same value is set
Samuel Stearns writes:
> I've got an old 7.4.5 instance of Postgres running on Linux. My transaction
> ID's are just over the 1 billion mark. I ran an instance wide vacuum analyse
> but this had now effect on the transaction ID count. Do I need to run a
> vacuum full?
No. There is no need
Howdy,
I've got an old 7.4.5 instance of Postgres running on Linux. My transaction
ID's are just over the 1 billion mark. I ran an instance wide vacuum analyse
but this had now effect on the transaction ID count. Do I need to run a vacuum
full?
Thanks,
Sam
Thanks for reply.
DBRD cfg we have :primary/primary both of the servers can be used for
writes/active while only one will be active always and other one is
passive ( PG is offline)
the user data directories and pg_xlog is using DBRD, the PG software
directory and $PG_DATA is local on each
Hi All -
We run both postgres 8.2.3 and 8.4.1 in unix environment. We have auto
vacuum configured and I am trying to find out its effectiveness. Here
are a couple of questions:
1) I'm running a query that compares actual table count with the pg_stat
table count ( pg_stat_user_tables.n_live_
Lou,
Thank you for your comments. The only way I could create a tablespace on a
remote server was to use an iscsi. Mapped drives would not work and shared
folders (privileges set for postgres server machine, postgres superuser,
and owner of tablespace is postgres) also do not work. There may be
Silvio Brandani wrote:
> Kevin Grittner ha scritto:
>> Check out the CONCURRENTLY keyword in CREATE INDEX:
> we really need to migrate to version postges 9.x .
FWIW, that's been a feature since 8.2.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes
Kevin Grittner ha scritto:
Silvio Brandani wrote:
Is it possible to use a reindex in a share lock mode ??
Check out the CONCURRENTLY keyword in CREATE INDEX:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-createindex.html
You could create a duplicate index concurrently,
select rowName,count(1)
from table
group by rowName
having count(1)>1
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Khangelani Gama <
khangelani.g...@ucs-software.co.za> wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> I am looking for a PostgreSQL Select command that will list me only
> duplicate rows.
>
>
>
> I am using psql 8.4.4
we are using reindex on single defragmented indexes on a nigtly schedule
script.
last night we encounter a problem of lock , a idle in transaction
connection keep a lock on the table and the reindex was in a wating
status and other connections were in a BIND waiting.
Is it possible to use a
Silvio Brandani wrote:
> Is it possible to use a reindex in a share lock mode ??
Check out the CONCURRENTLY keyword in CREATE INDEX:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-createindex.html
You could create a duplicate index concurrently, drop the old index,
and rename the n
Hi all
I am looking for a PostgreSQL Select command that will list me only duplicate
rows.
I am using psql 8.4.4.10
Thanks in advance
Confidentiality Notice:http://ucs.co.za/conf.html
The contents of and attachments to this e-mail are intended for the
12 matches
Mail list logo