Steve Crawford writes:
> Additionally (correct me if I'm wrong, Tom), background activity like
> autovacuum will generate countable transactions.
Yes, absolutely.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to yo
On 02/07/2013 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?utf-8?q?Milos_Gajdos?= writes:
What this shows is that xact_commit increases by 3 after just one row insert.
tup_inserted does seem to report correct value. After simple SELECT,
xact_commit increases by 2 - kind of strange as SELECT shouldn't really b
=?utf-8?q?Milos_Gajdos?= writes:
> What this shows is that xact_commit increases by 3 after just one row insert.
> tup_inserted does seem to report correct value. After simple SELECT,
> xact_commit increases by 2 - kind of strange as SELECT shouldn't really be
> increasing xact_commit ?
Yes, a
I've been searching for some information about Postgres 9.1 stats which are
stored in pg_stat_database - on the web and on IRC. I found SOME information
for 9.2 but even that doesn't seem to be accurate. What I'm after is to get
proper transaction stats ie commits and rollbacks. Also I've no clu
Vasiliy I Ozerov writes:
> I have an error, when doing database dump:
> pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: unexpected chunk size 384
> (expected 389) in final chunk 1 for toast value 11589 in pg_toast_2619
That looks like a data corruption problem :-(. You might want to check
into
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:50 AM, ALEXANDER JOSE wrote:
> What may be the best strategy for working postgres in cluster,
i would recommend http://repmgr.org/ which will help you to configure
and administrate a postgres cluster.
> now I have
> two postgres servers SuSE Linux Enterprise 11, and post
What may be the best strategy for working postgres in cluster, now I have two
postgres servers SuSE Linux Enterprise 11, and postgres database is at version
9.0.4.
Atentamente
Alexander
DBA
venezuela
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> Any pointers which would explain these differences would be greatly
> appreciate.
Postgres is likely not the only thing on your system that allocates shared
memory.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 72
Good day!
I have an error, when doing database dump:
psql -U postgres -p 56432 postgres > postgres.sql
pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: unexpected chunk size 384
(expected 389) in final chunk 1 for toast value 11589 in pg_toast_2619
pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query was: SELECT desc
Hi ,
You are mentioned SHMMAX larger value is no harm for the database , can i
keep this value as 100% of RAM ?
Right now we have two cluster in this server , one is having 8 GB and other
2 GB shared buffer .
But i am facing some issue , OS cache is filled frequently once i run some
query o
10 matches
Mail list logo