Hello,
Please follow the guide to report your problem:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:32 PM, wangqi wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> What's this in command 'ps ux'. If these processes appears The Server load
> average: 100.99, 100.74, 86.85.
> How
Hi everybody
What's this in command 'ps ux'. If these processes appears The Server
load average: 100.99, 100.74, 86.85.
How can I reslove it.
-
postgres 35044 34.2 0.0 0 0 ? Rs 00:19 50:42 [postmaster]
post
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
> I wish I could help - but I more of a sysamdin and less of a developer.
So was I, until I ran into this annoying issue where a table could only
have one owner.. Then I added support for roles. :)
> A "negotiate" option would be very cool. I will expec
On 25/03/13 15:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
Tim,
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
I presume the protocol does not allow the server to send a succession of
"Type: Authentication request" packets with different Authentication
types until it deems that one is acceptable?
Even if it did, ex
Tim,
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
> I presume the protocol does not allow the server to send a succession of
> "Type: Authentication request" packets with different Authentication
> types until it deems that one is acceptable?
Even if it did, existing clients would very likely be co
On 25/03/13 14:31, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost writes:
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
I would have to respectfully take another point of view: that that
particular judgement is probably better placed with the sysadmin
rather than a blanket decision by the devs.
It's not a blan
On 25/03/13 13:25, Stephen Frost wrote:
Tim,
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
I would have to respectfully take another point of view: that that
particular judgement is probably better placed with the sysadmin
rather than a blanket decision by the devs.
It's not a blanket decision b
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
>> I would have to respectfully take another point of view: that that
>> particular judgement is probably better placed with the sysadmin
>> rather than a blanket decision by the devs.
> It's not a blanket decision by any means- t
Tim,
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
> I would have to respectfully take another point of view: that that
> particular judgement is probably better placed with the sysadmin
> rather than a blanket decision by the devs.
It's not a blanket decision by any means- the current situation is
On 24/03/13 18:47, Stephen Frost wrote:
Tim,
* Tim Watts ([email protected]) wrote:
Is it possible to specify GSSAPI auth (with MIT kerberos as the
backend) but get Postgresql to fallback to prompting for a password
if a kerberos ticket cannot be supplied by the client - eg because
the clie
10 matches
Mail list logo