Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't believe anyone has proposed removing the facility
> altogether. There's a big difference between making the default
> behavior be not to have OIDs and removing the ability to have OIDs.
Right, that's what I had meant to say. Sorry for the inaccuracy.
Sai Hertz And Control Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have created my tables without OIDS now my doubts are :
> 1. Will this speed up the data insertion process
Slightly. It means that each inserted row will be 4 bytes smaller (on
disk), which in turn means you can fit more tuples on a p
ther parameter you might want to tweak is wal_buffers.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
