On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:04 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Peter Sabaini wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Peter Sabaini writes:
> >> > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high p
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Sabaini writes:
> > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
> > communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
> > packet filter rules in place, and I'd lik
Hello,
it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a
fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this
possible (sett
