Re: [ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
--- Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please tell us why integer datetimes should be enabled in our RPMs by default? We are not sure that many people need it, also it's easy for someone to add this support using the SRPMs provided. Consistent precision through the range

[ADMIN] Config option log_statement

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
In postgresql 8.0, create table as ... statements appear not to logged unless log_statement = 'all' in postgresql.conf. We are trying to reduce noise in the logs from pgAdminIII and phpPgAdmin, but we use a lot of 'create table as ...' queries that need to be logged, and their duration tracked.

Re: [ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-05-14 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because almost nobody has complained about the lack of it. (I'm talking about actual field experience of there being a problem, not somebody objecting that it sounds like a feature worth having.) It should also be pointed out that we are still

[ADMIN] PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

2005-04-06 Thread S Murthy Kambhampaty
Can integer datetimes support be added to the PGDG distributed RPMS for Fedora at the next version requiring an initdb. I've attached a diff to the specfile for 8.0.1. Thanks, Murthy --- /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-8.0.1-2PGDG.spec 2005-02-22 18:04:50.0 -0500 +++