Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Graichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i hope this list is somewhat the right one for this ...
>> i did some small tests with postgresql-71.beta4 on various
>> filesystems (ext2, reiserfs, xfs) on two machines: 1 si
er numbers)
may this be the reason for the missing improvement in the numbers
in the smp case?
again - a lot of thanks in advance
t
Thomas Graichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i hope this list is somewhat the right one for this ...
> i did some small tests with postgresql-71.beta4 on
i hope this list is somewhat the right one for this ...
i did some small tests with postgresql-71.beta4 on various
filesystems (ext2, reiserfs, xfs) on two machines: 1 single
cpu and one 2 cpu smp and was a bit surprised to see the tps
results of the smp case to be lower than the one of the up ca
