more info will be helpful, please let me know!
Many thanks
-Original Message-
From: Thomas F. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2005 08:09 PM
To: Werner vd Merwe
Cc: PgSQL Admin
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Performance Question
The long and short of it is that you should
-Original Message-
From: weiping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2005 05:55 PM
To: Werner vd Merwe
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Performance Question
what' your JDBC version?
if it's pretty old, then upgrade to newest one is a bet.
Don't k
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Nicholson
Sent: 15 March 2005 05:33 PM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Performance Question
Werner vd Merwe wrote:
>Output of VACUUM ANALYSE VERBOSE pg_listener:
>
>Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)
>INFO: vacuuming &qu
F.O'Connell
Sent: 14 March 2005 06:37 PM
To: Werner vd Merwe
Cc: PgSQL Admin
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Performance Question
Well, there's always the dbsize module in contrib to check actual size
on disk. I was thinking more in terms of approximate numbers of tables
and rows in those tables.
-tfo
-
greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
Werner vd Merwe
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 2005/03/11
makes
sense.
Best regards and thank you in
advance.
Werner vd Merwe
