Can anyone provide me a sample of auto vacuum and also step by step to
configure it inside my linux ubuntu server?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Auto-Vacuum-tp5728770.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:13 AM, teyking2003 tchongk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can anyone provide me a sample of auto vacuum and also step by step to
configure it inside my linux ubuntu server?
Here's the basic instructions on autovacuum for pgsql 8.2. Note that
since it's out of support, if you
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:13 AM, teyking2003 tchongk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can anyone provide me a sample of auto vacuum and also step by step to
configure it inside my linux ubuntu server?
Here's the basic
Hi Tom ,
Here is my error , the missing files were removed by mistake , I have
another similar db cfg with this tables:spherrtmp% and no issues.
I 'm thinking to restore this tables content from this second db ,
will this eliminate the auto vacuum error ?
07:45:59.770
Isabella Ghiurea isabella.ghiu...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca writes:
Here is my error , the missing files were removed by mistake , I have
another similar db cfg with this tables:spherrtmp% and no issues.
I 'm thinking to restore this tables content from this second db ,
will this eliminate the
HI Gurus
I'm seeing a issue with some temp tables in contrib_regression db , the
auto vacuum job will not run for this tables due some files/QID's
missing how can I fix this ?
The temp tables are growing too fast and they don't get
empty/clean-up...any tips ? I 'm running PGSQL 8.3.6 on
Isabella Ghiurea isabella.ghiu...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca writes:
I'm seeing a issue with some temp tables in contrib_regression db , the
auto vacuum job will not run for this tables due some files/QID's
missing how can I fix this ?
Um ... in general, autovacuum just silently ignores temp tables,
Hi All -
I am working to tune the auto vacuum in 8.4 and 8.2. I am finding that
some of the tables are not getting vacuumed even though they exceed
analyze/vacuum threshold. Do you know where auto vacuum process looks to
get the number of rows deleted/updated/inserted?
pg_stat_user_tables
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:44 -0800, Dinesh Bhandary wrote:
Hi All -
I am working to tune the auto vacuum in 8.4 and 8.2. I am finding that
some of the tables are not getting vacuumed even though they exceed
analyze/vacuum threshold. Do you know where auto vacuum process looks to
get the
Hi All -
We run both postgres 8.2.3 and 8.4.1 in unix environment. We have auto
vacuum configured and I am trying to find out its effectiveness. Here
are a couple of questions:
1) I'm running a query that compares actual table count with the pg_stat
table count (
Hi I installed the open source ERP Opentaps which have *802* tables and
using PostgreSQL as backend, and also filled the tables with demo data.
When I browse the tables using PgAdmin3 I get messages saying that:*
The estimated row count on the table some_table deviates significantly
from the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Ernesto Eduardo Medina Núñez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I installed the open source ERP Opentaps which have 802 tables and using
PostgreSQL as backend, and also filled the tables with demo data.
When I browse the tables using PgAdmin3 I get messages saying
Ernesto Eduardo Medina Núñez escribió:
Hi,
*autovacuum = on * # enable autovacuum subprocess?
#autovacuum_naptime = 60# time between autovacuum runs, in
secs
#autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 1000 # min # of tuple updates before
On 6 4 , 10 49 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Charles.Hou wrote:
i set the auto vacuum option to enable. but my database size(hard-
disk
space) still increased from 420MB to 440MB in 8 hours. most of the
operations in this database are the Select query command, just few
Charles.Hou wrote:
On 6 4 , 10 49 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
It is normal that the tables grow a bit to a stationary state of dead
space (generated by UPDATE and DELETE). However it is not normal if it
loses track of that dead space. One thing you can and should do is
i set the auto vacuum option to enable. but my database size(hard-
disk
space) still increased from 420MB to 440MB in 8 hours. most of the
operations in this database are the Select query command, just few
of Update or Insert.
why it can be increased so strongly?
after i executed the command
Charles.Hou wrote:
i set the auto vacuum option to enable. but my database size(hard-
disk
space) still increased from 420MB to 440MB in 8 hours. most of the
operations in this database are the Select query command, just few
of Update or Insert.
why it can be increased so strongly?
after i
On Thursday 19 April 2007 13:54, Carol Walter wrote:
I certainly appreciate the help you've given. Here's what the code
in this part of postgresql.conf file says.
autovacuum = on
autovacuum_naptime = 30 # time between autovacuum runs, in secs
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 500
Yes, Here's the results table
name | setting | unit | category |
short_desc| ex
tra_desc | context | vartype | source | min_val |
max_val
Carol Walter wrote:
Robert,
I did as you suggested and the values for autovacuum are null,
therefore I'm guessing it isn't running. Since postgres reports that
it is running, what other things might keep in from running?
Too high thresholds? All tables disabled in pg_autovacuum?
I certainly appreciate the help you've given. Here's what the code
in this part of postgresql.conf file says.
autovacuum = on
autovacuum_naptime = 30 # time between autovacuum runs, in secs
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 500 # min # of tuple updates before
My pg_catalog.pg_autovacuum table contains no entries.
Carol Walter
On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Carol Walter wrote:
Robert,
I did as you suggested and the values for autovacuum are null,
therefore I'm guessing it isn't running. Since postgres reports
that
it is
Are you talking about the log that is configured in postgresql.conf?
it goes to stderr and is redirected to pg_log directory with a time
and date stamp in the filename. It doesn't seem to logging anything
but planner statistics.
Carol
On Apr 19, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Carol Walter wrote:
Are you talking about the log that is configured in postgresql.conf?
it goes to stderr and is redirected to pg_log directory with a time
and date stamp in the filename. It doesn't seem to logging anything
but planner statistics.
Yes, that one. If it's not logging
I'm not sure if we've done a reload. I'm in an academic environment
and our department is in a state of flux right now. I'm in the
process of trying to get up to speed on postgreSQL as fast as I can.
Here is the result set from that query.
select * from pg_settings where name =
Carol Walter wrote:
I'm not sure if we've done a reload. I'm in an academic environment
and our department is in a state of flux right now. I'm in the
process of trying to get up to speed on postgreSQL as fast as I can.
Here is the result set from that query.
select * from
I asked questions about auto vacuum earlier. As I said in my earlier
email, when I select autovacuum the system responds that it's on.
Some here told me when I asked the questions before that I should see
log entries for it when it kicks off. In postgresql.conf, it says
that the
Carol Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see any references to auto-vacuum in the log. What
would the references look like?
Which PG version are you running, exactly?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
8.2.3 is what is reported when I run psql with the -V option.
Thanks,
Carol
On Apr 17, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Carol Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see any references to auto-vacuum in the log. What
would the references look like?
Which PG version are you running,
Carol Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
8.2.3 is what is reported when I run psql with the -V option.
In 8.2 you need to increase log_min_messages to see anything about
autovacuum. It reports per-database activity at DEBUG1 and per-table
activity at DEBUG2 level. Unfortunately DEBUG2 will fill
Hi,
On startup we get an error in the postgres log that the Autovacuum process has
failed to start -- autovacuum not started because of misconfiguration.
However, if we do a restart (/etc/init/d/postgresql8.1 restart) then the
autovacuum starts fine.
Does anybody have any idea what the
Hi,
On startup we get an error in the postgres log that the Autovacuum process has
failed to start -- autovacuum not started because of misconfiguration.
However, if we do a restart (/etc/init/d/postgresql8.1 restart) then the
autovacuum starts fine.
Does anybody have any idea what the
Nick Howden wrote:
Hi,
On startup we get an error in the postgres log that the Autovacuum process
has
failed to start -- autovacuum not started because of misconfiguration.
However, if we do a restart (/etc/init/d/postgresql8.1 restart) then the
autovacuum starts fine.
Does
Hi,
On startup we get an error in the postgres log that the Autovacuum process
has
failed to start -- autovacuum not started because of misconfiguration.
However, if we do a restart (/etc/init/d/postgresql8.1 restart) then the
autovacuum starts fine.
Does anybody have any idea what
Nick Howden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The firewall rules I have are :
# Postgres Statistics Collector
iptables -A INPUT -p udp \
-i lo --sport 32779 --dport 32779 \
-j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp \
-o lo --sport 32779 --dport 32779 \
-j ACCEPT
###
We have a bytea column where we store large attachments (ie pdf file).
every so often (2 weekly) we replace the large a attachment (5-15mb) with a
much smaller binary file (15k).
when I run
SELECT sum( relpages*8/1024 ) as MB FROM pg_class where relname != ''
I get a value of 104995 which I
Warren Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when I run
SELECT sum( relpages*8/1024 ) as MB FROM pg_class where relname != ''
I get a value of 104995 which I interpret to mean I have 104GB of stored data
in the database and this value has remained relatively static (+/- 1GB) over
the past
Also, remember that a regular vacuum won't actually free any disk
space*, it only marks it as re-useable in the table.
* OK, technically it will reclaim space from the very end of the table
* in certain circumstances, but in reality it's pretty rare for that to
* happen.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at
Jeff Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since we're on the vacuum kick these days, what's the best way to tell if my
autovacuum settings are working well? I'm sure I can query some info out of
the pg_stats tables, no?
If the database isn't bloating (ie, physical storage growing faster than
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:47:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since we're on the vacuum kick these days, what's the best way to tell if
my
autovacuum settings are working well? I'm sure I can query some info out
of
the pg_stats tables, no?
If the
Thanks Tom!
Now what does the relpages column mean? I.e. how should I interpret that
entry for my tables?
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
If the database isn't bloating (ie, physical storage growing faster than
valid data volume) then it's getting the job done. Keep an eye on
du
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:59:49AM -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
Thanks Tom!
Now what does the relpages column mean? I.e. how should I interpret that
entry for my tables?
relpages is the number of pages of the table. A page is 8kb (unless
you changed a compile-time setting -- you can check it
Since we're on the vacuum kick these days, what's the best way to tell if my
autovacuum settings are working well? I'm sure I can query some info out of
the pg_stats tables, no?
Also, if using autovacuum, should I still do a vacuum full on a regular
basis?
--
Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL
43 matches
Mail list logo
