On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Igor Neyman wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@bfk.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:00 AM
>> To: Gabriele Bartolini
>> Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
>> Subject: Re: Database alias
>>
>> * Gabriele Bartolini:
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@bfk.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:00 AM
> To: Gabriele Bartolini
> Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: Database alias
>
> * Gabriele Bartolini:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:30:34 +, Florian Weimer
> > wr
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:30:34 +, Florian Weimer
wrote:
We've got some systems which use a historic database name and would
like
to transition them to our current naming scheme. Is there support
for
some form of database aliases?
If you are trying to make the database seen by clients unde
* Gabriele Bartolini:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:30:34 +, Florian Weimer
> wrote:
>> We've got some systems which use a historic database name and would
>> like to transition them to our current naming scheme. Is there
>> support for some form of database aliases?
>
> If you are trying to make
We've got some systems which use a historic database name and would like
to transition them to our current naming scheme. Is there support for
some form of database aliases?
The alias doesn't need to be visible in server responses, so we could
probably add a kludge to the server code which rewrit
