admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL crashes
"Moshe Ben-Shoham" writes:
> I believe there are two problems here: one is the process 2604 exiting
> with code 128, and the other one is the re-initialization failure with
> the following fatal message: "BS
"Moshe Ben-Shoham" writes:
> I believe there are two problems here: one is the process 2604 exiting
> with code 128, and the other one is the re-initialization failure with
> the following fatal message: "BST FATAL: pre-existing shared memory
> block is still in use".
The second problem is most
It's on Windows Server 2003
Thanks,
Moshe.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Moshe Ben-Shoham
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL crashes
"Moshe Ben-Shoham" writes:
> 2
"Moshe Ben-Shoham" writes:
> 2009-05-27 10:39:41 BST LOG: server process (PID 2604) exited with exit
> code 128
What platform is this on?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://ww
Hi,
We're using postgresql-8.3.5-1.
Lately, once in a while, the PostgreSQL service crashes and the
following appears in the log. Any idea what could cause that?
I believe there are two problems here: one is the process 2604 exiting
with code 128, and the other one is the re-initializat
On 3/12/07, Joost Kraaijeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The PostgreSQL of a customer database (running on Windows 2003) crashed
and wrote the messages below in the logfile. According to the customer
the drives are working OK, partitions are not full and nothing has
changed in the permission
Hi,
The PostgreSQL of a customer database (running on Windows 2003) crashed
and wrote the messages below in the logfile. According to the customer
the drives are working OK, partitions are not full and nothing has
changed in the permissions. The customer could restart the PostgreSQL
service manual
