On Monday 20 August 2001 18:08, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 02:37:55PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > And, YES, library versions under Linux distributions are as bad if
> > not worse than Windows' 'DLL Hell' is. Well, at least mostly.
> > RPM-based Linux distributions at least _
On Monday 20 August 2001 09:13, John Turner wrote:
> > As to rebuilding from SRPMS, if you have enough to compile from the
> > tarball you simply:
> > rpm --rebuild postgresql-7.1.2-4PGDG.src.rpm
> > and pick up your binary RPMs from /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386.
> >
> > Much simpler than a hand comp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lamar Owen) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Wednesday 08 August 2001 12:15, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > I downloaded the postgresql-7.1.2 rpms and tried to install them - I had 20
> > lines of failed dependancies. I downloaded the RPMS for those, and ended
> >
Thanks for that Alan,
However, as the box I was putting it onto is a new one, I am making an effort
to stick to RPM's this time, as much as an academic exerciser as anything
else.
I actually found it quite easy to download the SRPM and build all the binary
RPMs from it. It also means that if
On Monday 13 August 2001 22:28, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > At the risk of starting to stray OT for this list, how do you go about
> > installing SRPMS - I've never done anything like that before.
> An easier way to do this would be to download the postgresql tarball.
Nop
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> At the risk of starting to stray OT for this list, how do you go about
> installing SRPMS - I've never done anything like that before.
An easier way to do this would be to download the postgresql tarball.
Download the following:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftpsite/v7.1.2
