- Original Message -
From: "Eric L. Blevins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Signal 11
> From: "Andrew Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Eric L. Blevins"
FYI, our "signal 11" problem was caused by faulty cache memory on the RAID
controller.
-Original Message-
From: Eric L. Blevins [mailto:eblevins@;insight.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Signal 11
From: "Andrew Su
"Eric L. Blevins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: "Andrew Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Have you checked your physical memory for flaws?
>>
> Yes, I have checked the memory, it is fine.
I'd suggest checking harder ;-). I think an unreliable section of
memory is by far the most probable ex
From: "Andrew Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eric L. Blevins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Signal 11
>
> Have you checked your physical memory for flaws?
>
Yes, I have checked the memory, it is
I'm fairly new to postgres, we are using postgresql-7.2.3 on Linux Red-Hat
8.0
I am having a problem with the shared buffers setting.
Whenever I set the shared buffers above 96 I start getting Segmentation
Faults
when performing queries.
However, if I leave the shared buffers set to 96 or lower t
