Re: [ADMIN] fsync tests

2010-06-10 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:07 PM, RBN wrote: > > > I ran test_fsync on a local ext 3 partition and on a raid jfs SSD array > 8x32GB RAID10.  The local disk returned quickly and gave what looks like > acceptable results.  However, the RAID looks pretty bad.  Any one have any > idea why fsync would ta

Re: [ADMIN] fsync tests

2010-06-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
RBN wrote: > I ran test_fsync on a local ext 3 partition and on a raid jfs SSD array > 8x32GB RAID10. The local disk returned quickly and gave what looks like > acceptable results. However, the RAID looks pretty bad. Any one have any > idea why fsync would take so long on an SSD RAID 10. As the

[ADMIN] fsync tests

2010-06-06 Thread RBN
I ran test_fsync on a local ext 3 partition and on a raid jfs SSD array 8x32GB RAID10. The local disk returned quickly and gave what looks like acceptable results. However, the RAID looks pretty bad. Any one have any idea why fsync would take so long on an SSD RAID 10. LOCAL DISK Simple write