On 10/12/2012 4:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bill MacArthur writes:
Here is the top line of the *really long* explain as run on a 9.0 server (it
takes only a couple of seconds to return): HashAggregate
(cost=1148.97..1149.36 rows=1 width=205)
However, the same query run on the same machine after u
Bill MacArthur writes:
> Here is the top line of the *really long* explain as run on a 9.0 server (it
> takes only a couple of seconds to return): HashAggregate
> (cost=1148.97..1149.36 rows=1 width=205)
> However, the same query run on the same machine after upgrade to 9.2.1 never
> returns.
I value the work of the community and in particular the dedicated committers on
the postgres team, regardless of this little wrinkle we have encountered upon
our transition from 9.0 to 9.2. Since the number of tables involved is
ridiculously small and the amount of data is negligible, at this p