Very naïve question here: Why would you want to save the data from the first
insert?
I thought the purpose of a transaction was to make sure that all steps in the
transaction executed, or none of them executed. If Oracle saves half of the
data between the beginning and ending of the
I have the same confusion...
于 2011/11/30 2:34, Rob Richardson 写道:
Very naïve question here: Why would you want to save the data from the first
insert?
I thought the purpose of a transaction was to make sure that all steps in the
transaction executed, or none of them executed. If Oracle
On 29 November 2011 21:34, Rob Richardson rdrichard...@rad-con.com
wrote:
If Oracle saves half of the data between the beginning and ending of the
transaction, doesn't that defeat the purpose of the transaction?
It sure enough kills Atomicity. I can see a use for this on importing data
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-admin-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Rob Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:35 PM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transaction error handling
Very naïve question here: Why
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transaction error handling
On 29 November 2011 21:34, Rob Richardson
rdrichard...@rad-con.commailto:rdrichard...@rad-con.com wrote:
If Oracle saves half of the data between the beginning and ending of the
transaction, doesn't that defeat the purpose of the transaction
On 11/30/2011 09:19 PM, Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) wrote:
This functionality is something that Postgres can do today. We expose
the ability to do this with explicit savepoints. The difference is
that Oracle allows you to set it on a per transaction basis (I
believe) and it will behave
Hi
On 30 November 2011 22:30, Kasia Tuszynska ktuszyn...@esri.com wrote:
With Postgres that is not the case, if the 50th sql statement in a long
transaction incurs an error, the whole transaction is rolled back for you
automatically, you the developer have no say in that unless you bracket
Hi Everybody,
This is an architectural question.
I am testing on Postgres 9.0.2 on windows and linux(suse, rhel, ubuntu)
I want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of the Postgres
architecture and would like to enquire if there are any plans to change it.
Comparing Oracle and
Kasia Tuszynska ktuszyn...@esri.com wrote:
Oracle:
Begin transaction
Insert - no error
Implicit savepoint
Insert - error raised
Implicit rollback to the savepoint, no transaction loss, error
raised on the insert statement that errored out.
End transaction, implicit commit, with the
@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transaction error handling
Kasia Tuszynska ktuszyn...@esri.com wrote:
Oracle:
Begin transaction
Insert - no error
Implicit savepoint
Insert - error raised
Implicit rollback to the savepoint, no transaction loss, error
raised on the insert statement that errored
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Kasia Tuszynska ktuszyn...@esri.com wrote:
Postgres:
Begin transaction
Insert - no error
Insert - error raised
Transaction loss = no implicit rollback to the single error free insert.
Is this a correct interpretation of the Postgres transaction error
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:57:24 -0800, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
Hi Everybody,
This is an architectural question.
I am testing on Postgres 9.0.2 on windows and linux(suse, rhel, ubuntu)
I want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of the
Postgres architecture and would like to
...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Walter Hurry
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:50 PM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transaction error handling
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:57:24 -0800, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
Hi Everybody,
This is an architectural question.
I am testing on Postgres
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-admin-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Kasia Tuszynska
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:35 PM
To: Kevin Grittner; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transaction error handling
Hi Kevin
14 matches
Mail list logo
