On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:42:46PM +0530, sathiya psql wrote:
> i need what will be the maximum number of rows *to have good performance* in
> postgres 8.1
any. just accept the fact that count(*) is *always* slow.
use triggers to store counts if you are using them all of the time.
also, i have t
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 17:42 +0530, sathiya psql wrote:
>
>
> I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link
> answers
> your question:
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/
> this i know.
>
> this is the documentation limitations...
>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:42:46PM +0530, sathiya psql wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link answers
> > your question:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/about/
> >
> this i know.
>
> this is the documentation limitations...
>
> i need what will be the maximum num
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:12 AM, sathiya psql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i need what will be the maximum number of rows to have good performance in
> postgres 8.1
This article give you the options that you have with postgresql.
http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/joshua_drake/2007/08/how_many_ro
>
>
> I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link answers
> your question:
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/
>
this i know.
this is the documentation limitations...
i need what will be the maximum number of rows *to have good performance* in
postgres 8.1
Regards
Sathiya
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:42 AM, sathiya psql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, finally am changing my question.
> Do get quick response from postgresql what is the maximum number of records
> i can have in a table in postgresql 8.1 ???
I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link a
Ok, finally am changing my question.
Do get quick response from postgresql what is the maximum number of records
i can have in a table in postgresql 8.1 ???
