Dallas N Antley wrote:
> /- On Monday (8/16/2004 19:35) Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you've proven that the particular PAM modules you are
> > testing with are useless for programs executing as non-root, but
> > that doesn't mean the entire concept is broken. Look around ...
> >
/- On Monday (8/16/2004 19:35) Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dallas N Antley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think I know why pam authentication fails with the pam_unix*
> > modules, but would appreciate your opinion.
>
> I think you've proven that the particular PAM modules you are test
Dallas N Antley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think I know why pam authentication fails with the pam_unix*
> modules, but would appreciate your opinion.
I think you've proven that the particular PAM modules you are testing
with are useless for programs executing as non-root, but that doesn't
mea
