ient, please contact the
sender and destroy all copies of this message.
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/16/2007 4:10 PM
To: Henry, Nigel, CYFD
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Isolated databases or instances
On Fri,
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 16:30, Henry, Nigel, CYFD wrote:
> More information:
>
> As stated, this is going to be a SLES 9.3 environment -- 64-bit.
> VMWare, for now, is out of the question because we currently only have
> IBM HS20 blades which are unable to host the 64-bit environment in
> VMWare.
c Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and destroy all copies of this message.
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/16/2007 2:50 PM
To: Henry, Nigel, CYFD
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Isolated databases or
If you really need three discrete instances, you might want to look at
using vmware to set up three separate virtual machines, each with their
own IPs etc... on that one box.
This was my thought; depending on how much RAM you have in each blade, you
could have two virtual servers on each blad
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:18, Henry, Nigel, CYFD wrote:
> >> We are at the beginning of the building of a 3-tier
> >> development/test/uat environment. We would like some advice on how
> >> the PostgreSQL
Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:18, Henry, Nigel, CYFD wrote:
>> We are at the beginning of the building of a 3-tier
>> development/test/uat environment. We would like some advice on how
>> the PostgreSQL database should be configured for this environment.
>
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:18, Henry, Nigel, CYFD wrote:
> We are at the beginning of the building of a 3-tier
> development/test/uat environment. We would like some advice on how
> the PostgreSQL database should be configured for this environment.
>
> The environments will be installed on three
