N/A wrote:
Hi,
I'm putting together a mission critical application which will use a
Postgresql database, and I am trying to decide if I should place my
Postgresql database on a network attached storage appliance or on
local disks.
Wherever possible, I think that local storage is almost al
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> Also I wonder what the impact of several Postmasters trying to access
> data over NFS would be.
That will lead to corruption very quickly.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que la verdad absoluta no existe...
El p
N/A wrote:
Chris,
The NAS is a Network Appliance 920c. I understand that an individual file
while be "intact" during a snap, (not sure I believe it, but that's what I'm
told).
Depending on the way that data is journalled, this may be a possibility
(istr XFS is able to do this).
The NAS m
lesystem to a Linux Redhat 3 running the
application.)
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Question on placing database on a network attac
