Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-24 Thread Kieren Scott
Thank you. Kieren > To: kierensc...@hotmail.com > CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:17:02 -0400 > From: t...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > Kieren Scott writes: > > [ hypothetical scenario: ] >

Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Lane
Kieren Scott writes: > [ hypothetical scenario: ] > You can't start the instance because it needs to write to the WAL disk > (which is full), but if you manually move WAL files off the WAL disk, > the archiver will fail because it can't find WAL files it needs to > archive. Uh, no, that shouldn't

Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-23 Thread Kieren Scott
? Wouldnt you have to free some space in the wal filesystem in order to get postgres up and running? Thanks for you help. > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:41:59 -0500 > From: kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov > To: kierensc...@hotmail.com; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WAL

Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
Kieren Scott wrote: > Sorry it's a bit of a what-if scenario. I can envisage > encountering a situation in the future whereby we hit this > problem, and I was trying to put a plan in place for how to deal > with it. Oh, OK. I was afraid you had actually *hit* this situation and were being coy

Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-23 Thread Kieren Scott
ing a situation in the future whereby we hit this problem, and I was trying to put a plan in place for how to deal with it. Thanks in advance. > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:47:57 -0500 > From: kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov > To: kierensc...@hotmail.com; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > S

Re: [ADMIN] WAL and archive disks full

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Grittner
Kieren Scott wrote: > What would be the best course of action for resolving a situation > whereby your postgres instance had crashed due to the wal disk and > archive wal disk becoming 100% full? Say your backups have been > failing and your 'monitoring' had not reported it correctly. > > You c