On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Marc Mamin wrote:
> But if I prefix my pattern with the schema name, then I finally get the
> expected result:
>
>pg_dump -i -v -nXXX -T 'XXX.*2008*' -T ' XXX.*2009*' -T ' XXX.*201001*' -T
> XXX.'*201002*' .
>
>
> seems that the use of the -n flag require
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Marc Mamin wrote:
> But if I prefix my pattern with the schema name, then I finally get the
> expected result:
>
>pg_dump -i -v -nXXX -T 'XXX.*2008*' -T ' XXX.*2009*' -T ' XXX.*201001*' -T
> XXX.'*201002*' .
>
>
> seems that the use of the -n flag require
here is a strange behaviour:
I did first simplify my syntax with multiples -T flags:
pg_dump -i -v -nXXX -T '*2008*' -T '*2009*' -T '*201001*' -T '*201002*'
.
still not working.
But if I prefix my pattern with the schema name, then I finally get the
expected result:
pg_dump -i -