On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I followed this advice for picking a good effective_cache_size value
> (below) from Scott Marlowe, and run into a bit of trouble:
>
> I looked at the `top' output and saw "721380k cached".
> So I calculated the effective cache siz
Hello,
I followed this advice for picking a good effective_cache_size value
(below) from Scott Marlowe, and run into a bit of trouble:
I looked at the `top' output and saw "721380k cached".
So I calculated the effective cache size using Scott's formula:
721380/8 = 90172
Then I changed my effe
