On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:43:43AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 00:52, ? wrote:
> > David Bear:
> >
> > Yes. I agree with you.
> > \copy is really too brittle.
> > I wonder why \copy is not like oracle's sqlldr?
> > I think sqlldr is m
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 00:52, 李江华 wrote:
> David Bear:
>
> Yes. I agree with you.
> \copy is really too brittle.
> I wonder why \copy is not like oracle's sqlldr?
> I think sqlldr is more powerful. When using sqlldr,we can specify the
> maximum error records we al
David Bear:
Yes. I agree with you.
\copy is really too brittle.
I wonder why \copy is not like oracle's sqlldr?
I think sqlldr is more powerful. When using sqlldr,we can specify the
maximum error records we allow,and we can also specify the number we should
co
On June 23, 2005 03:27 pm, David Bear wrote:
> I'm finding the \copy is very brittle. It seems to stop for everyone
> little reason. Is there a way to tell it to be more forgiving -- for
> example, to ignore extra data fields that might exists on a line?
>
> Or, to have it just skip that offending
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:27:44PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
>
> I'm finding the \copy is very brittle. It seems to stop for everyone
> little reason. Is there a way to tell it to be more forgiving -- for
> example, to ignore extra data fields that might exists on a line?
>
> Or, to have it just sk
