Hi!
Can you create a virtual network interface, assign an address to it and
> have PostgreSQL listen to it in addition to the socket? I'm thinking not
> the eth0:X type but potentially what VirtualBox (vboxnet0), VMware (vmnet0)
> or other virtualization products do using brctl.
>
This might act
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Bèrto ëd Sèra wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> That's a pretty stupid requirement. The stats collector socket is bound
>> to itself, so it's inaccessible from anywhere else (on machine or off)
>> regardless of firewall settings. There's no need to worry about it,
>> and no th
Hi!
> That's a pretty stupid requirement. The stats collector socket is bound
> to itself, so it's inaccessible from anywhere else (on machine or off)
> regardless of firewall settings. There's no need to worry about it,
> and no there is not a provision for doing it via unix socket instead.
>
=?UTF-8?B?QsOocnRvIMOrZCBTw6hyYQ==?= writes:
> I have a requirement for PG (9.1) to run without any open port at all.
That's a pretty stupid requirement. The stats collector socket is bound
to itself, so it's inaccessible from anywhere else (on machine or off)
regardless of firewall settings. T
