Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-14 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 08 August 2001 12:15, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I downloaded the postgresql-7.1.2 rpms and tried to install them - I had 20 > lines of failed dependancies. I downloaded the RPMS for those, and ended > up with 70+ lines of failed dependancies. The current PGDG RPMset will work just fi

Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-09 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Wednesday 08 August 2001 6:49 pm, Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Hmmm, > > > > I downloaded the postgresql-7.1.2 rpms and tried to install them - I had > > 20 lines of failed dependancies. I downloaded the RPMS for those, and > > e

Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-08 Thread Ragnar Kjørstad
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hmmm, > > I downloaded the postgresql-7.1.2 rpms and tried to install them - I had 20 > lines of failed dependancies. I downloaded the RPMS for those, and ended up > with 70+ lines of failed dependancies. > > Does anyone have

Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-08 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hmmm, I downloaded the postgresql-7.1.2 rpms and tried to install them - I had 20 lines of failed dependancies. I downloaded the RPMS for those, and ended up with 70+ lines of failed dependancies. Does anyone have any suggestions on where I should go next (excluding th pub - I've already ta

Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-08 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi Lamer, I've had a look and the only 7.1.2 rpms is in beta/roswell. I dont' fancy beta stuff on my production servers. Everything else on the RedHat site is 7.0.x. You mention RawHide. What is this, and where can I find it. TIA, Gary On Wednesday 08 August 2001 3:47 am, Lamar Owen wrot

Re: [ADMIN] upgrading RPM query

2001-08-07 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 11:27, Gary Stainburn wrote: > binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-7.1 [snip] > I'm at bit confused at this, as I would have thought that the path to the > RPM's would suggest that they are specific enough - no? No. It just means that RH 7.1 is the platform that binary was built