Tom, et al,
> > ERROR: cannot find attribute 1 of relation schedule_notification_log
>
> This is more disturbing. Can you provide the sequence of commands that
> led up to it?
Here are a few related datapoints.
1) We think that schedule_notification_log is the only table that
we loaded fr
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2002 at 12:49, Brian McCane wrote:
>
> > I am on FreeBSD 5.0.
>
> There is a reason why you must be on 5.0? That is not recommended for
> "sane" people.
>
> 5.0 is -current and not the best place to be running important
> applications At p
Hi, all,
I am installing postgresql-7.1.2 on Linux 2.4.12. I did configure
with only one option --prefix= when I did make ( I am using
gnu make 3.78.1 and gcc 2.95.2), I got errors below:
...
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations command.o
common.o help.o input.o st
We are still running 7.1.3. Can anyone
highlight the big differences or reasons to upgrade? Is there some documentation
on this?
Thanks
Jodi
___Jodi
L KanterBioInformatics Database AdministratorUniversity of
Virginia(434) 924-2846[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 May 2002 at 8:20, Brian McCane wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> >
> > On 12 May 2002 at 12:49, Brian McCane wrote:
> >
> > > I am on FreeBSD 5.0.
> >
> > There is a reason why you must be on 5.0? That is not recommended for
> > "sane" people.
> >
> > 5.0 is -current a
Tao Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am installing postgresql-7.1.2 on Linux 2.4.12.
Just out of curiosity, why aren't you installing 7.2.1?
Even if you have some reason to want to use a 7.1.* release, 7.1.3
would be the preferred choice.
Dunno about the _fxstat problem. Looking at /usr/in
Jodi Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are still running 7.1.3. Can anyone highlight the big differences or rea=
> sons to upgrade? Is there some documentation on this?
The release notes always mention the main improvements. Quoting from
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/p
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Yes there is
documentation, yes there are changes.
if you're happy
with what you're on, don't bother.
The main change I
noticed was that it no longer allows the illegal syntax of =
NULL
( I KNOW I KNOW,
but I liked using it! :p)
From the History
file in Redhat RPM documentation for 7
Hi, all,
just wonder whether I a root account required to install pgSql on Linux?
Thanks
Tony
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that yo
"Mark McEahern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom, thanks for your reply. I am now able to create databases and users
> with longer names, but I am unable to login with the long username.
I think you're stuck on that, unless you want to be *really*
incompatible with the rest of the world. The s
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Tao Wan wrote:
> just wonder whether I a root account required to install pgSql on Linux?
You shouldn't need a root account to install from source, although you'll
almost certainly need to give a prefix to configure to put it in some
place the user has access to write to (si
12 matches
Mail list logo
